Re: libc5 FAQ

1997-05-29 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
Hello, > I must second Andreas here. The ISDN stuff is an exception. Oh come on, there are millions of exceptions. The KErnel Development has never stoped and will never stop. There is a lot of redesign goiug on: new routing, new address families, new arp, new console, new device drivers, new me

Re: libc5 FAQ

1997-05-29 Thread Nils Rennebarth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On 28 May 1997, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > The bottom line is: if a program needs kernel header, the > chances are that the program, or the design of the program, is > broken. I must second Andreas here. The ISDN stuff is an exception. There is active devel

Re: libc5 FAQ

1997-05-29 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, Mixing user domain and kernel domain stuff is a really bad Idea, but you don't have to take just my word for it. I already have posted the FAQ once today, and I don't want to do so again: Please read the libc FAQ (or email me and I will send you a copy). The bottom line is

Re: libc5 FAQ

1997-05-29 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
Hello, > My contention is: if we are talking about a program that needs > kernel headers, and can't be satisfied with the headers included in > the libc5-dev package (which corresponds to 2.0.29, or something), > that means we are talking about a program that needs some very > specific k

Re: libc5 FAQ

1997-05-28 Thread srivasta
Hi, My contention is: if we are talking about a program that needs kernel headers, and can't be satisfied with the headers included in the libc5-dev package (which corresponds to 2.0.29, or something), that means we are talking about a program that needs some very specific kernel data