Re: libc-bin

2013-04-06 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 7:45 PM, carlos wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Thanks for your time and job! > I've trying to use Chromiun latest trunk but its requires libc-bin > 2.15, > even I use Debian Testing I do not have this package. &

Re: libc-bin

2013-04-06 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 06:45:15PM -0500, carlos wrote: > I've trying to use Chromiun latest trunk but its requires libc-bin > > 2.15, even I use Debian Testing I do not have this package. > Is thought to have libc 2.17 on Debian testing soon? As experimental already has 2.17

Re: libc-bin

2013-04-06 Thread Marc Haber
On Fri, 05 Apr 2013 18:45:15 -0500, carlos wrote: >Is thought to have libc 2.17 on Debian testing soon? Unlikely. Even unstable has only libc 2.13, and at this stage of the release I guess that hell will freeze over before the release team will allow a new libc upstream version into Debian wheezy

libc-bin

2013-04-05 Thread carlos
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Thanks for your time and job! I've trying to use Chromiun latest trunk but its requires libc-bin > 2.15, even I use Debian Testing I do not have this package. Is thought to have libc 2.17 on Debian testing soon? -BEGIN PGP S

Re: making libc-bin essential

2011-07-02 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2011-07-01 10:31 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Currently libc-bin is virtually essential: a lot of essential packages > depend on libc6 which in turn depends on libc-bin. This package has been > created during the first steps of the multiarch transition two years > ago, and all

making libc-bin essential

2011-07-01 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Hi all, I am contacting debian-devel as per policy, in order to make libc-bin essential. Currently libc-bin is virtually essential: a lot of essential packages depend on libc6 which in turn depends on libc-bin. This package has been created during the first steps of the multiarch transition two