Re: libFOO-BAR naming convention

2007-11-23 Thread Ivan Shmakov
>>>>> Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I vaguely recall seeing a recommendation for library packages for a >> particular language to follow libFOO-BAR naming convention in >> Debian, where FOO is the name of a library, and BAR is an arbitrary

RE: libFOO-BAR naming convention

2007-11-23 Thread Jeremiah Foster
Hello, > I vaguely recall seeing a recommendation for library packages > for a particular language to follow libFOO-BAR naming convention > in Debian, where FOO is the name of a library, and BAR is an > arbitrary common suffix (thus, liberror-perl, or >

libFOO-BAR naming convention

2007-11-23 Thread Jeremiah Foster
Hello, > I vaguely recall seeing a recommendation for library packages > for a particular language to follow libFOO-BAR naming convention > in Debian, where FOO is the name of a library, and BAR is an > arbitrary common suffix (thus, liberror-perl, or >

Re: libFOO-BAR naming convention

2007-11-23 Thread Loïc Minier
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007, Ivan Shmakov wrote: > I vaguely recall seeing a recommendation for library packages > for a particular language to follow libFOO-BAR naming convention > in Debian, where FOO is the name of a library, and BAR is an > arbitrary common

Re: libFOO-BAR naming convention

2007-11-23 Thread Nico Golde
Hi Ivan, * Ivan Shmakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-23 14:57]: > I vaguely recall seeing a recommendation for library packages > for a particular language to follow libFOO-BAR naming convention > in Debian, where FOO is the name of a library, and BAR is an &g

libFOO-BAR naming convention

2007-11-23 Thread Ivan Shmakov
I vaguely recall seeing a recommendation for library packages for a particular language to follow libFOO-BAR naming convention in Debian, where FOO is the name of a library, and BAR is an arbitrary common suffix (thus, liberror-perl, or libsqlite-ocaml