Re: ldbl128 transition for liborbit2 could be omitted

2008-01-12 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 03:56:17AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Hi, > looking at why ORBit hadn’t been updated to the latest upstream version, > I noticed there is an open RC bug about the ldbl128 transition. Given > the number of rdeps (373), this is a huge beast to update. > However, lookin

ldbl128 transition for liborbit2 could be omitted

2008-01-11 Thread Josselin Mouette
Hi, looking at why ORBit hadn’t been updated to the latest upstream version, I noticed there is an open RC bug about the ldbl128 transition. Given the number of rdeps (373), this is a huge beast to update. However, looking at the headers, I can see that in fact, it can probably be avoided. The ba