Re: lcms -> lcms2 migration

2014-02-09 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Thomas Weber (2014-02-09 13:00:47) > On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 02:21:46AM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: >> On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 11:25:48AM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >>> On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Moritz Mühlenhoff >>> wrote: Hi, lcms needs to go for jessie in fa

Re: lcms -> lcms2 migration

2014-02-09 Thread Thomas Weber
On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 02:21:46AM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 11:25:48AM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Moritz Mühlenhoff > > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > lcms needs to go for jessie in favour of lcms2 (#717928). (liblcms1-dev > >

Re: lcms -> lcms2 migration

2014-02-08 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 11:25:48AM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > Hi, > > lcms needs to go for jessie in favour of lcms2 (#717928). (liblcms1-dev -> > > liblcms2-dev) > > The maintainer seems MIA, so I'm going ahead. Below is a dd

Re: lcms -> lcms2 migration

2013-12-29 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > Hi, > lcms needs to go for jessie in favour of lcms2 (#717928). (liblcms1-dev -> > liblcms2-dev) > The maintainer seems MIA, so I'm going ahead. Below is a dd-list of affected > packages. > This is a headsup as recommended by policy,

lcms -> lcms2 migration

2013-12-29 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
Hi, lcms needs to go for jessie in favour of lcms2 (#717928). (liblcms1-dev -> liblcms2-dev) The maintainer seems MIA, so I'm going ahead. Below is a dd-list of affected packages. This is a headsup as recommended by policy, I'll file bugs in a few weeks. I've made a few test builds/conversions (