Hi Joachim,
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 02:49:00PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> >
> > I hope you are aware that taring up two byte identical trees usually
> > does not lead to a byte identical tarball.
>
> Well, I was hoping that uscan would not simply create new tarballs, but
> rather removing
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 13.03.2014, 14:06 +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> > This would be quite annoying in my usual workflow.
>
> I hope you are aware that taring up two byte identical trees usually
> does not lead to a byte identical tarball.
Well, I was hoping that uscan would not simply create
Hi Lisandro,
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 07:53:52PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> >
> > it sounded be too good to be true:
> >
> > $ rm ../*tar.gz && uscan --download && md5sum
> > ../haskell-ekg_0.3.1.4+dfsg.orig.tar.gz haskell-ekg: Newer version
> > (0.3.1.4) available on re
Hi Joachim,
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 11:02:27PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 12.03.2014, 18:37 -0300 schrieb Lisandro Damián Nicanor
> Pérez Meyer:
> > > Do you (or anyone) know if it repacks the file consistently? I.e. will
> > > two developers, who both use uscan to
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 08:06:14AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 6:14 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
>
> > I guess it just unpacks, removes and repacks. Which also means it would
> > be quite annoying in my own workflow which involves unpacking/repacking
> > 700MB. The script I'm using
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 6:14 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
> I guess it just unpacks, removes and repacks. Which also means it would
> be quite annoying in my own workflow which involves unpacking/repacking
> 700MB. The script I'm using now does the filtering on the tar stream
> itself, without actually
On Wednesday 12 March 2014 23:02:27 Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 12.03.2014, 18:37 -0300 schrieb Lisandro Damián Nicanor
>
> Pérez Meyer:
> > > Do you (or anyone) know if it repacks the file consistently? I.e. will
> > > two developers, who both use uscan to get the original
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 11:02:27PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 12.03.2014, 18:37 -0300 schrieb Lisandro Damián Nicanor
> Pérez Meyer:
> > > Do you (or anyone) know if it repacks the file consistently? I.e. will
> > > two developers, who both use uscan to get the origi
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 12.03.2014, 18:37 -0300 schrieb Lisandro Damián Nicanor
Pérez Meyer:
> > Do you (or anyone) know if it repacks the file consistently? I.e. will
> > two developers, who both use uscan to get the original tarball for the
> > same version and with the same File-Excluded get ident
On Tuesday 11 March 2014 09:07:43 Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Dienstag, den 11.03.2014, 10:34 +0800 schrieb Paul Wise:
> > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 1:27 AM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > > nor mess with tarball repackaging (which I consider ugly, a cludge, and
> > > to be avoided if possible
Quoting Joachim Breitner (2014-03-11 11:29:31)
> Am Dienstag, den 11.03.2014, 11:22 +0100 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
> > Quoting Russ Allbery (2014-03-11 03:32:54)
> > > Paul Wise writes:
> > >
> > >> I'd suggest an acceptable workaround is to include the source in the
> > >> debian.tar.gz/diff.gz
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 11.03.2014, 11:22 +0100 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
> Quoting Russ Allbery (2014-03-11 03:32:54)
> > Paul Wise writes:
> >
> >> I'd suggest an acceptable workaround is to include the source in the
> >> debian.tar.gz/diff.gz or to repack the upstream tarball, probably the
> >>
Quoting Russ Allbery (2014-03-11 03:32:54)
> Paul Wise writes:
>
>> I'd suggest an acceptable workaround is to include the source in the
>> debian.tar.gz/diff.gz or to repack the upstream tarball, probably the
>> latter since jQuery is usually an embedded code copy.
>
>> https://wiki.debian.org/
Hi.
Joachim Breitner writes:
> Hi,
>
> I keep discussing the same issues caused by minified JS files (mostly
> JQuery) in their source tarballs over and over. Could maybe those who
> care deeply about this write a concise wiki page with all that upstream
> needs to know about our expectations, s
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 11.03.2014, 10:34 +0800 schrieb Paul Wise:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 1:27 AM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > nor mess with tarball repackaging (which I consider ugly, a cludge, and
> > to be avoided if possible)
>
> Recent versions of uscan can automatically repack upstream tarb
Paul Wise writes:
> I think that DFSG item 2 means we have promised not to do this.
>
> Also this particular issue is in the reject FAQ.
>
> https://ftp-master.debian.org/REJECT-FAQ.html
It would be very helpful if Paul could at this point give a URL to
exactly which item he's referring to. But
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 1:27 AM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> nor mess with tarball repackaging (which I consider ugly, a cludge, and
> to be avoided if possible)
Recent versions of uscan can automatically repack upstream tarballs to
remove files, just include a Files-Excluded line in debian/copyrig
Paul Wise writes:
> I'd suggest an acceptable workaround is to include the source in the
> debian.tar.gz/diff.gz or to repack the upstream tarball, probably the
> latter since jQuery is usually an embedded code copy.
> https://wiki.debian.org/EmbeddedCodeCopies
Note that we do not (and should n
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> as long as the code in question is not under a license that requires the
> full, non-minified source to be reproduced and if the copyright notices and
> license terms as potentially required by the license are present, I don't
> see why not. B
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 2014-03-10 18:27, Joachim Breitner wrote:
>>
>> I keep discussing the same issues caused by minified JS files (mostly
>> JQuery) in their source tarballs over and over. Could maybe those who
>> care deeply about this write a conci
Hi,
On 2014-03-10 18:27, Joachim Breitner wrote:
I keep discussing the same issues caused by minified JS files (mostly
JQuery) in their source tarballs over and over. Could maybe those who
care deeply about this write a concise wiki page with all that upstream
needs to know about our expectation
On 2014-03-10 13:05:30, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On March 10, 2014 06:27:01 PM Joachim Breitner wrote:
>
> > Also, am I too pragmatic in suggesting that we should accept non-source
> > files in tarballs if they are legally distributed and not used during
> > the build (especially not included in
On March 10, 2014 06:27:01 PM Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Also, am I too pragmatic in suggesting that we should accept non-source
> files in tarballs if they are legally distributed and not used during
> the build (especially not included in the binary packages)?
I generally take that approach.
Hi,
I keep discussing the same issues caused by minified JS files (mostly
JQuery) in their source tarballs over and over. Could maybe those who
care deeply about this write a concise wiki page with all that upstream
needs to know about our expectations, so that I can point them to it?
That page sh
24 matches
Mail list logo
