Am Dienstag, den 07.06.2011, 10:46 +0100 schrieb Neil Williams:
> On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 11:34:30 +0200
> Vincent Danjean wrote:
>
> > > A few days ago, we had a discussion about a packaging-dev meta package.
> > > The responses were between neutral and positive. Therefore I created a
> > > initial
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 11:34:30 +0200
Vincent Danjean wrote:
> > A few days ago, we had a discussion about a packaging-dev meta package.
> > The responses were between neutral and positive. Therefore I created a
> > initial draft [1] and tried to incorporate all suggestions made in the
> > discussio
Hi,
On 05/06/2011 15:46, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A few days ago, we had a discussion about a packaging-dev meta package.
> The responses were between neutral and positive. Therefore I created a
> initial draft [1] and tried to incorporate all suggestions made in the
> discussion.
>
> T
Am Sonntag, den 05.06.2011, 15:11 +0100 schrieb Neil Williams:
> On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 15:46:44 +0200
> Benjamin Drung wrote:
>
> > A few days ago, we had a discussion about a packaging-dev meta package.
>
> > This package is just for packaging, not for developing. So gdb, pylint
> > and co. won't
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 15:46:44 +0200
Benjamin Drung wrote:
> A few days ago, we had a discussion about a packaging-dev meta package.
> This package is just for packaging, not for developing. So gdb, pylint
> and co. won't go into it. This package should be installed by packagers.
> No other packag
Hi,
A few days ago, we had a discussion about a packaging-dev meta package.
The responses were between neutral and positive. Therefore I created a
initial draft [1] and tried to incorporate all suggestions made in the
discussion.
The list looks currently like this:
Depends: build-essential,
6 matches
Mail list logo
