Justin Maurer wrote:
> > Justin, can you find out if those machines are binary compatible.
> > I've heard that there are two general types flying around (5i and
> > 3i, iirc). I wonder if one new architecture is enough or if we
> > need both - like for mips.
>
> which two machines? the ones the p
At 14:56 -0400 1999-05-18, Ben Collins wrote:
On Tue, May 18, 1999 at 01:45:04PM -0500, Justin Maurer wrote:
well, for the cross compilers, i'm doing /usr/lib/parisc-xxx
e.g,
/usr/bin/parisc-egcs
/usr/bin/parisc-as
etc.
You should really use standard gnu style, such as
parisc-linux-{gcc,as,ld,...}
On Tue, May 18, 1999 at 01:45:04PM -0500, Justin Maurer wrote:
> well, for the cross compilers, i'm doing /usr/lib/parisc-xxx
> e.g,
> /usr/bin/parisc-egcs
> /usr/bin/parisc-as
> etc.
You should really use standard gnu style, such as parisc-linux-{gcc,as,ld,...}
and /usr/parisc-linux/{lib,bin,incl
>> (me saying a bootable kernel is still quite aways off)
> I wonder if this ITP is a little bit early then...
well, sort of. i can still package the cross compilers and such, so that we
will all be ready for it. but the new arch obviously is still another relase
or two away.
i have binutils pa
Justin Maurer wrote:
> consider this my intent to package pa-risc egcs and binutils. the kernel,
> when
> one arrives, too. i speak with the puffins (www.thepuffingroup.com, for those
> who don't know) on a daily basis, so i suppose i am a good candidate. i plan
> to order myself a machine when
5 matches
Mail list logo
