On 10/02/14 14:55, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On 09/02/2014 13:14, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> Is it too late to fix this as a release goal, so that we get every
>> init script to use /bin/sh?
>
> Whether this is worth the effort or not (and not just *your* effort, the
> effort of maintainers of packag
On 09/02/2014 13:14, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Is it too late to fix this as a release goal, so that we get every
> init script to use /bin/sh?
Whether this is worth the effort or not (and not just *your* effort, the
effort of maintainers of packages with init scripts, even if just to
review and app
On Feb 09, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > That's it... So that's a typical case where it should be possible to fix
> > things, and get rid of bash.
> Is that really an important goal to spend our time on?
No. It has never been a goal, there is nothing to "fix" here.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Descr
Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2014-02-09 09:19:55 -0800:
> On 02/09/2014 11:22 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2014-02-09 05:14:17 -0800:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> While we can discuss during literally *years* about which init system to
> >> use, I think it
On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 09:14:17PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Thomas,
>...
> If possible, I'd like to make a survey of what kind of interpreter
> packages are using for /etc/init.d scripts. How can I do that? Note that
> this would make OpenRC maintainer's life more easy, and avoid ugl
On 02/09/2014 11:22 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2014-02-09 05:14:17 -0800:
>> Hi,
>>
>> While we can discuss during literally *years* about which init system to
>> use, I think it's more productive to try to improve what we have in
>> packages, so I'd like to
Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2014-02-09 05:14:17 -0800:
> Hi,
>
> While we can discuss during literally *years* about which init system to
> use, I think it's more productive to try to improve what we have in
> packages, so I'd like to talk about that.
>
> One thing that bothers me i
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> [Thomas Goirand]
>> If possible, I'd like to make a survey of what kind of interpreter
>> packages are using for /etc/init.d scripts. How can I do that? Note
>> that this would make OpenRC maintainer's life more easy, and avoid
>> ugly
[Thomas Goirand]
> If possible, I'd like to make a survey of what kind of interpreter
> packages are using for /etc/init.d scripts. How can I do that? Note
> that this would make OpenRC maintainer's life more easy, and avoid
> ugly hacks.
You can find all init.d scripts unpacked on lintian.debian
Hi,
While we can discuss during literally *years* about which init system to
use, I think it's more productive to try to improve what we have in
packages, so I'd like to talk about that.
One thing that bothers me is that some of our sysv-rc init.d scripts
aren't using /bin/sh as interpreter.
For
10 matches
Mail list logo