On Fri, 28 Mar 2014 09:05:49 +0800
Paul Wise wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 5:36 AM, Sven Bartscher wrote:
>
> > Also I'm not really sure if this is even a good idea, or if there is
> > maybe another program already present which does already identify
> > unused, manually installed packages an
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 5:36 AM, Sven Bartscher wrote:
> Also I'm not really sure if this is even a good idea, or if there is
> maybe another program already present which does already identify
> unused, manually installed packages and I just didn't find it.
deborphan seems like a similar package
On Thu, 27 Mar 2014, Sven Bartscher wrote:
> This approach also brings some problems. For example some packages
> that have files which belong to a frequently scanned database aren't
> detected because they are accessed by the scan.
popcon-largest-unused gets at this somewhat, and you could achiev
Sven Bartscher writes:
> I thought a little while about this problem and came up with the idea,
> that every manually installed package whose files were not accessed for
> more than a specified time (a month, a year, whatever) could be
> considered unneeded.
> So I started writing a script that
Greetings everyone.
As we all know apt-get does a very good job, by identifying which
packages were installed automatically as dependencies and aren't needed
anymore.
Wile this is very nice, I still fear that, from time to time, there are
manually installed packages gathering on my computer which I
5 matches
Mail list logo
