Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 02:37:53PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
>
>>Matthijs Mohlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>>I don't know where to send this else, so forgive me if this is the wrong
>>>mailinglist.
>
>
>>>See:
>>>http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=pdns&ver
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 12:24:47PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
>> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > Historically such
>> > problems were unpleasantly frequent on buildds due to a combination of
>> > buggy
>> > postrm scripts, and a bug in
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 12:24:47PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Historically such
> > problems were unpleasantly frequent on buildds due to a combination of buggy
> > postrm scripts, and a bug in dpkg's rollback support when calling dpkg
> > --purge fo
LaMont Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 11:08:14AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
>> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > or a bug in some
>> > maintainer script or other;
>> How a bug in a maintainer script could have the result that installing
>> an arch-all packa
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 11:08:14AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > or a bug in some
> > maintainer script or other;
> How a bug in a maintainer script could have the result that installing
> an arch-all package fails because an other arch-all package is no
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 11:08:14AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
>
>> It *seems* it has been fixed; but I don't know whether it has just
>> disappeared, or has been fixed by human intervention, and if yes by
>> which. Since the first may be true, it might
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 11:08:14AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 02:37:53PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> >> The same happened to the planner package, and has been reported as
> >> #344538. It seems that hppa buildd is broken, do
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 02:37:53PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
>> The same happened to the planner package, and has been reported as
>> #344538. It seems that hppa buildd is broken, don't know yet whether
>> the buildd admin (Lamont) or anybody of the de
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 02:37:53PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> Matthijs Mohlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't know where to send this else, so forgive me if this is the wrong
> > mailinglist.
> > See:
> > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=pdns&ver=2.9.19-2&arch=hppa&stamp=1135294
Matthijs Mohlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't know where to send this else, so forgive me if this is the wrong
> mailinglist.
>
> See:
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=pdns&ver=2.9.19-2&arch=hppa&stamp=1135294848&file=log&as=raw
>
> [..]
[...]
> As you can see, tetex-base
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I don't know where to send this else, so forgive me if this is the wrong
mailinglist.
See:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=pdns&ver=2.9.19-2&arch=hppa&stamp=1135294848&file=log&as=raw
[..]
Setting up tetex-base (3.0-11) ...
Removing unch
11 matches
Mail list logo
