Re: grsecurity bugs

2003-09-21 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.09.21.2035 +0200]: > Er...what 2.4 kernel are you talking about? That doesn't sound > like Linux 2.4 at all. With respect to Debian packaging, it should. The fact that Linux 2.4 kernels osciallate features is irrelevant in this discussion, beca

Re: grsecurity bugs

2003-09-21 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Martin-?ric Racine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.09.21.1931 +0200]: > I might as well download the upstream tarball from kernel.org > myself and then make my own debian/ folder! No need. make-kpkg will create it. -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. ma

Re: grsecurity bugs

2003-09-21 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 08:31:36PM +0300, Martin-?ric Racine wrote: > The whole point of having a stable branch (currently 2.4) is to guarantee that > people can have a _reliable_ kernel that they can trust will: > > 1) Behave in a predictable way that is consistant with previous releases from >

Re: grsecurity bugs

2003-09-21 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
In-Reply-To=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>&Subject=Re:%20Re: Debian should not modify the kernels! On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, martin f krafft wrote: > I have uploaded a new version of grsecurity. However, it won't support > Debian kernels 2.4.20 and up. README.2.4.2x in the package will tell you > why. In additio