sean finney wrote:
> in the long run, i think it would be preferable to have this package
> have support for gnutls as an alternative to openssl. however, i don't
> even know where to start on this. does anyone here have some notes
> or links handy where i could start for porting the few ssl-usi
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 11:56:15AM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On 10/18/05, sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [1] please don't file an rc bug against my package for my having mentioned
>>this... i've recently adopted it and would like to see the 30 some odd
>>bugfixes make it
On 10/18/05, sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [1] please don't file an rc bug against my package for my having mentioned
>this... i've recently adopted it and would like to see the 30 some odd
>bugfixes make it into testing.
Isn't it possible to tell the BTS the RC bug also applies
hey -devel,
the zombie of gpl vs. openssl has once again arisen from the grave,
this time, in one of the packages that i maintain (nagios-plugins).
as i'm on the upstream development team as well, i've already clarified
with the other developers there that this is an omission, and that
we'll eithe
4 matches
Mail list logo
