glibc 2.3.2 and testing

Hi, I'd like to know, why all recently updated and new packages in testing have a dependancy on glibc >= 2.3.2? Wouldn't it be enough if they depend just on glibc? BTW: Why are all those packages going into testing if they are uninstallable? Regards, Mike Dornberger PS: Please Cc me, I'm not su

Re: glibc 2.3.2 and testing

On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 05:46:54PM +0200, Mike Dornberger wrote: > I'd like to know, why all recently updated and new packages in testing have > a dependancy on glibc >= 2.3.2? Wouldn't it be enough if they depend just > on glibc? Binaries built against glibc 2.3.2 really do depend on glibc 2.3.2