Re: future of Debian amavisd-milter package

2016-12-11 Thread Ian Jackson
Paul Gevers writes ("Re: future of Debian amavisd-milter package"): > On 08-12-16 23:24, Christoph Biedl wrote: > > Although I'm not a user of that package, I consider removing it from > > stretch the wrong thing to do. > > Opinions differ. I raised the

Re: future of Debian amavisd-milter package

2016-12-09 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi On 08-12-16 23:24, Christoph Biedl wrote: > Although I'm not a user of that package, I consider removing it from > stretch the wrong thing to do. Opinions differ. I raised the issue of removing more packages from Debian a while ago and got different responses.ยน If nobody is maintaining such a

Re: future of Debian amavisd-milter package

2016-12-08 Thread Christoph Biedl
har...@a-little-linux-box.at wrote... > While it would theoretically also be possible to file a RFA or O bug I > currently do not consider this a good course of action: The number of QA > packages is already very high and while adopting amavisd-milter would be > not so much of a problem to maintai

future of Debian amavisd-milter package

2016-12-06 Thread harald
Dear Debian developers, I am the maintainer for the above mentioned package but I'm not using it anymore and also do not possess the facilities for doing testing so I am planning to ask FTP masters for a package removal. While it would theoretically also be possible to file a RFA or O bug I curre