Bug#927477: ITS: fluxbox -- low resource X11 Window manager

2019-04-20 Thread Tong Sun
Package: fluxbox Severity: important Owner: Dmitry E. Oboukhov (closed #927457 & redoing it again) * Package name : fluxbox * URL : http://git.fluxbox.org/fluxbox.git * License : MIT Programming Lang: C++ Description : Highly configurable and low resource

Bug#927457: ITP: fluxbox -- low resource X11 Window manager

2019-04-19 Thread Tong Sun
Package: wnpp Severity: important Owner: Dmitry E. Oboukhov * Package name: fluxbox * URL : http://git.fluxbox.org/fluxbox.git * License : MIT Programming Lang: C++ Description : Highly configurable and low resource X11 Window manager Reason to pack: to salvage

Re: RFH: fluxbox -- Highly configurable and low resource X11 Window manager

2009-11-21 Thread Andreas Marschke
Hi, I would like to help fluxbox as I do have some experience in writing code and developing applications in various languages etc. Could you give me some pointers to hit on or any good/easy hacks you use? Sincerely , Andreas Marschke. On Sunday 25 October 2009 16:22:53 Dmitry E. Oboukhov

RFH: fluxbox -- Highly configurable and low resource X11 Window manager

2009-10-25 Thread Dmitry E. Oboukhov
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Unfortunately, now I do not have enough time to maintain this package properly, so help/comaintain would be appreciated. I adopted fluxbox when it had more than 120 bugs. Now it has 34 bugs, i think that the most part of them (or of the last of them) is

Re: fluxbox

2007-02-14 Thread Charles Plessy
responsability-denying maintainer would say that if it works for him he does not need to fix for others. But the maintainer of fluxbox seems more MIA (missing in action) than something else. There are many threads about MIA on this list, as well as documentation in the developper's reference. May

Re: fluxbox

2007-02-14 Thread Greg Folkert
On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 10:15 +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [...] > > I am sure yoush hasn't done a thing with it, as Experimental packages > > don't need to be maintained, period. > > Bullshit. Experimental is a playground, not a graveyard for dev

fluxbox

2007-02-14 Thread Dmitry E. Oboukhov
te: GF> On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 01:30 +0300, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote: >> Hi! >> There's the following problem with the fluxbox package. >> >> The locale in the etch distributive ia already set into UTF-8 as >> default. Fluxbox has been maintaining UTF-8 for a l

Re: fluxbox

2007-02-14 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > I am sure yoush hasn't done a thing with it, as Experimental packages > don't need to be maintained, period. Bullshit. Experimental is a playground, not a graveyard for development releases. It's supposed to be used as a testing ground for unstable,

Re: fluxbox

2007-02-13 Thread Greg Folkert
On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 01:30 +0300, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote: > Hi! > There's the following problem with the fluxbox package. > > The locale in the etch distributive ia already set into UTF-8 as > default. Fluxbox has been maintaining UTF-8 for a long time. > >

fluxbox

2007-02-13 Thread Dmitry E. Oboukhov
Hi! There's the following problem with the fluxbox package. The locale in the etch distributive ia already set into UTF-8 as default. Fluxbox has been maintaining UTF-8 for a long time. From July in experimental/ there had been 0.9.15version with full maintaining of UTF-8. But in

Re: advice sought for fluxbox (release-critical, possible dpkg bug)

2005-05-23 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.23.1301 +0200]: > > Looks good to me. > > I meant, do this with a version of fluxbox installed that no > longer provides /usr/bin/bsetbg. Isn't that just another incarnation of the dpkg bug? -- Please do not send

Re: advice sought for fluxbox (release-critical, possible dpkg bug)

2005-05-23 Thread Steve Langasek
dpkg knows nothing > > about. > I cannot confirm this: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# dpkg -l fluxbox blackbox | grep ^ii > ii fluxbox0.1.7-3Highly configurable and low resource X11 > Win > ii blackbox 0.62.1-1 Window manager for X > [

Re: advice sought for fluxbox (release-critical, possible dpkg bug)

2005-05-23 Thread martin f krafft
n 0.9.11-* is used to upgrade the > > woody version. 0.9.11-* does not provide /usr/bin/bsetbg > > anymore, but 0.1.7-3 is not given a chance to remove it, since > > on an upgrade, old-postrm/remove is (obvioulsy) not called. > > That part is a fluxbox bug, and not even a bug

Re: advice sought for fluxbox (release-critical, possible dpkg bug)

2005-05-23 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 11:51:29AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > The fluxbox in woody, 0.1.7-3 diverts /usr/bin/bsetbg to > /usr/bin/bsetbg.blackbox, but it only removes those diversions in > postrm/remove. Installing and deinstalling this package works fine, > with or without blackb

advice sought for fluxbox (release-critical, possible dpkg bug)

2005-05-23 Thread martin f krafft
The fluxbox in woody, 0.1.7-3 diverts /usr/bin/bsetbg to /usr/bin/bsetbg.blackbox, but it only removes those diversions in postrm/remove. Installing and deinstalling this package works fine, with or without blackbox installed: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# dpkg -l fluxbox | grep ^ii ii fluxbox

Re: what to do about fluxbox?

2005-05-20 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.21.0149 +0200]: > So the diversion here are leftovers which weren't deleted. Oh oh, > fluxbox, things are looking bad. So apart from test -d /etc/X11/fluxbox && rm -rf /etc/X11/fluxbox in postrm, which coul

Re: what to do about fluxbox?

2005-05-20 Thread martin f krafft
[ported to -devel from -release, -release on Bcc] In the 0.9.11-1 changelog: - Removed diverts (Closes: Bug#263512) So the diversion here are leftovers which weren't deleted. Oh oh, fluxbox, things are looking bad. Thanks Steve for keeping a clear head when mine was in the clouds