On 03/05/2018 09:51, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 03.05.2018 09:03, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
>> On 03/05/2018 08:43, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>
>>> On 03.05.2018 07:29, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
Hi,
FTBFS bugs haveveen filed for packages that fail under gcc8.
>>> I didn't file any, an
On 03.05.2018 09:03, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> On 03/05/2018 08:43, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
>> On 03.05.2018 07:29, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> FTBFS bugs haveveen filed for packages that fail under gcc8.
>> I didn't file any, and I didn't see any being filed. Which ones do you mea
On 03/05/2018 08:43, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 03.05.2018 07:29, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> FTBFS bugs haveveen filed for packages that fail under gcc8.
> I didn't file any, and I didn't see any being filed. Which ones do you mean?
They were filed by Lucas Nussbaum, e.g. #897518, #89
On 03.05.2018 07:29, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> Hi,
>
> FTBFS bugs haveveen filed for packages that fail under gcc8.
I didn't file any, and I didn't see any being filed. Which ones do you mean?
Hi,
FTBFS bugs haveveen filed for packages that fail under gcc8.
Unfortunately that includes fortran packages: gfortran 8 has changed its
mod file format again, so all packages depending on other fortran libs
will fail until all are rebuilt under gfortran 8 as the default compiler.
Can we downgr
Hi,
I'm intending to update binutils to 2.31 and GCC to 2.8.x for the buster
release. binutils 2.31 has an upstream release date around Agust 2018, and GCC
8 will be released next week (already available in unstable). It's usually this
time when I start filing bug reports for packages which don'
6 matches
Mail list logo