Hello
On Sun, Apr 13, 2003 at 02:07:55AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > > I once tried to do something similar, but noticed that
> > > user-mode-linux does the same thing to a fuller extent.
> > >
> > > If you look at it this way, user-mode-linux is a fakeroot that traps
> > > all syscalls
> > I once tried to do something similar, but noticed that
> > user-mode-linux does the same thing to a fuller extent.
> >
> > If you look at it this way, user-mode-linux is a fakeroot that traps
> > all syscalls.
>
> user-mode-linux has too big overload and it is available only for i386
> > I really don't know. The fakeroot is not my project and I'm afraid my
> > patches are too experimental for such stable tool. Also there is too much
> > work with cleaning up the code. Should I start new project or join to the
> > original fakeroot?
>
> I once tried to do something similar
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 07:49:20PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> AFAIK user-mode-linux require root access to set up the network
> to have network access under uml.
No, this is only true for the tuntap transport. The slirp transport, for
example, requires no additional privileges, and it is not
Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
> I really don't know. The fakeroot is not my project and I'm afraid my
> patches are too experimental for such stable tool. Also there is too much
> work with cleaning up the code. Should I start new project or join to the
> original fakeroot?
Start a fakechroot project :)
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 11:50:20PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > I really don't know. The fakeroot is not my project and I'm afraid my
> > patches are too experimental for such stable tool. Also there is too much
> > work with cleaning up the code. Should I start new project or join to the
> >
> > > http://people.debian.org/~dexter/fakeroot/
> > >
> > > Have a good fun!
> > >
> > Nice. Very nice. Will you put that into the official fakeroot?
>
> I really don't know. The fakeroot is not my project and I'm afraid my
> patches are too experimental for such stable tool. Also there is too m
On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> > http://people.debian.org/~dexter/fakeroot/
> >
> > Have a good fun!
> >
> Nice. Very nice. Will you put that into the official fakeroot?
I really don't know. The fakeroot is not my project and I'm afraid my
patches are too experimental for such stab
Hi,
> http://people.debian.org/~dexter/fakeroot/
>
> Have a good fun!
>
Nice. Very nice. Will you put that into the official fakeroot?
Why do you comment out the mount calls in debootstrap?
Much nicer to just wrap the mount(2) syscall...
--
Matthias
http://people.debian.org/~dexter/fakeroot/
This is very dirty hack, but it works. I mean you can use debootstrap on
your user account without root privileges.
An example session from my system:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ fakeroot
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# export
PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sb
10 matches
Mail list logo
