On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 09:13:52PM -0800, Ryan Murray wrote:
> This is an ABI change, and as ALSA 0.5 is still the stable release, (and
> the only one that seems to work for me) I don't want to change it yet.
Well, what Ryuichi said... ALSA people don't support 0.5 anymore. In any
case, I guess it
It would be useful if someone would package the current
esound program. The esound package maintainer has clearly
expressed his lack of interest in doing so.
esound2 anyone?
--
Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(Please cc: me if you reply this message.)
Ok, I understand what your thinking. I will not do NMU.
However, I don't think only ALSA 0.5 is stable release. The current
ALSA is also enough stable for sid ("unstable" release) users. So I
believe the upload of esound with libas
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 01:48:12PM +0900, Ryuichi Arafune wrote:
> any objections?
This is an ABI change, and as ALSA 0.5 is still the stable release, (and
the only one that seems to work for me) I don't want to change it yet.
> As in #170923, we have newer version of esound. If
Debian esound
(Please cc me when you reply this message.)
Hello all,
As I said in Bug#170915, I would like to do NMU for esound package
built with libasound2.
I send the mail one week ago, but the current maintainer have not
replied any more.
any objections?
As in #170923, we have newer version of esou
5 matches
Mail list logo
