On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 11:54:05AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> At present there *is* no reliable sysadmin interface for enabling/disabling
>> services. update-rc.d is not it; many admins have been using 'update-rc.d
>> -f remove' fo
]] Olaf van der Spek
| On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Raphael Geissert wrote:
| >> | In particular, considering the possibility of other init systems coming
| >> | (see #591791), would /usr/sbin/service enable/disable still be a proper,
| >> | init-system-independent, abstraction?
| >>
| >> I'
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>> | In particular, considering the possibility of other init systems coming
>> | (see #591791), would /usr/sbin/service enable/disable still be a proper,
>> | init-system-independent, abstraction?
>>
>> I'm guessing service would have to le
Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Stefano Zacchiroli
>
> | In particular, considering the possibility of other init systems coming
> | (see #591791), would /usr/sbin/service enable/disable still be a proper,
> | init-system-independent, abstraction?
>
> I'm guessing service would have to learn how all
Steve Langasek schrieb am Friday, den 04. March 2011:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 01:21:02PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > > In particular, considering the possibility of other init systems coming
> > > (see #591791), would /usr/sbin/service enable/disable still be a proper,
> > > init-system-ind
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 01:21:02PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > In particular, considering the possibility of other init systems coming
> > (see #591791), would /usr/sbin/service enable/disable still be a proper,
> > init-system-independent, abstraction?
> I don't see a problem in shipping my o
Stefano Zacchiroli schrieb am Freitag, den 04. März 2011:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 11:54:05AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > At present there *is* no reliable sysadmin interface for enabling/disabling
> > services. update-rc.d is not it; many admins have been using 'update-rc.d
> > -f remove'
On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 at 12:43:36 +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> What do other distros use?
> It seems to be chkconfig, not service (for this functionality).
Perhaps worth noting here that because systemd is mainly being developed in
Fedora, their versions of chkconfig and service already know ab
]] Stefano Zacchiroli
| In particular, considering the possibility of other init systems coming
| (see #591791), would /usr/sbin/service enable/disable still be a proper,
| init-system-independent, abstraction?
I'm guessing service would have to learn how all other init systems
work, or have a w
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Right, this is the technical problem to solve: find one (handy) method
> to enable/disable services and "bless" it as the recommended one.
What do other distros use?
It seems to be chkconfig, not service (for this functionality).
Olaf
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 11:54:05AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> At present there *is* no reliable sysadmin interface for enabling/disabling
> services. update-rc.d is not it; many admins have been using 'update-rc.d
> -f remove' for years, but this is /wrong/ and it is /documented/ that this
> w
11 matches
Mail list logo
