Thanks Antonio!
Your changes at https://salsa.debian.org/salsa/salsa-webhook look good to me
On Mon, Jun 02, 2025 at 02:06:59PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 01, 2025 at 12:15:33PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Quoting Julien Plissonneau Duquène (2025-06-01 12:05:43)
> > > Hi Jonas,
> > >
> > > Le 2025-05-31 21:41, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> > > >
> > > > The proble
On Sun, Jun 01, 2025 at 12:15:33PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Julien Plissonneau Duquène (2025-06-01 12:05:43)
> > Hi Jonas,
> >
> > Le 2025-05-31 21:41, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> > >
> > > The problem is that the confident submitter is a bot.
> > >
> > > In the concrete case, I
Hi Jonas,
Le 2025-05-31 21:41, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
The problem is that the confident submitter is a bot.
In the concrete case, I replied to point out that the bug closure was a
mistake. That reply bounced.
Is it wrong of me to cc the "person" interacting with a bugreport?
Is it wrong
Quoting Julien Plissonneau Duquène (2025-06-01 12:05:43)
> Hi Jonas,
>
> Le 2025-05-31 21:41, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> >
> > The problem is that the confident submitter is a bot.
> >
> > In the concrete case, I replied to point out that the bug closure was a
> > mistake. That reply bounced.
Quoting Otto Kekäläinen (2025-06-01 08:07:01)
> Your reply had:
>
> To: 972695-qu...@bugs.debian.org,
> 972695-submit...@bugs.debian.org, Yadd
>
> I am wondering did you add this 972695-qu...@bugs.debian.org manually
> or was it in the Reply-To headers? In this case it would have been
> best
Hi!
> Arguably, such setup is spam: I is a bot that messes with the bugs but
> is not accountable for its actions, since it is only a one-way
> communication. Sure, I can then investigate the email and figure out
> which non-email side channel might reach the true originator of the
> bot activity,
On Sat, 31 May 2025 20:17:59 +0200, Santiago Vila
wrote:
>I don't see a big problem in those messages being "noreply",
>considering that they are generated automatically,
Answers to these messages shouldnt result in a generic bounce.
Greetings
Marc
--
---
El 31/5/25 a las 21:41, Jonas Smedegaard escribió:
That's an automatically triggered message created by a gitlab hook,
which parses the commit message for "closes: #n" and notifies the bug
submitter when it's known that the bug is fixed in salsa.
The problem is that the confident submitter
Quoting Santiago Vila (2025-05-31 20:17:59)
> El 31/5/25 a las 18:19, Jonas Smedegaard escribió:
> > The concrete incidence is https://bugs.debian.org/972695#28
> >
> > Am I missing something sensible here, or do others also see a problem
> > in this setup?
> That's an automatically triggered mess
El 31/5/25 a las 18:19, Jonas Smedegaard escribió:
The concrete incidence is https://bugs.debian.org/972695#28
Am I missing something sensible here, or do others also see a problem
in this setup?
That's an automatically triggered message created by a gitlab hook,
which parses the commit message
I received an update to a bugreport, but responding to it bounced.
I don't know if this is a one-off experiment or a common setup, but
I find it bad for Salse to inject automated emails to Debbugs: Debbugs
is supposed to be usable with email interaction.
Arguably, such setup is spam: I is a bot t
12 matches
Mail list logo
