Hi Ralf,
On Freitag, 23. Mai 2014, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> the redirection will be done soon, as soon as the generation of the xml
> files for the weather applets is in place. An announcement to dda will also
> follow later, maybe when I have completed some more of the features.
cool.
> To which
On 2014-05-23, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> Which packages exactly contain these applets ? I guess in this case we
> should continue providing the xml files with the data, which is quite
> easy to do.
At least kde-workspace has code that can provide it as sources for the
weather desktop widget.
(It is n
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 5:36 AM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> How does this relate to debcheck? Debcheck seem to be stale, but it is
FYI debcheck is no longer stale (see #749022).
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
wit
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 3:34 AM, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> the redirection will be done soon, as soon as the generation of the xml
> files for the weather applets is in place. An announcement to dda will also
> follow later, maybe when I have completed some more of the features.
https://wiki.debian.o
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 12:40:30PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Ralf,
>
> On Donnerstag, 22. Mai 2014, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > > the analysis of not-installable packages due to dependency issues that
> > > we did since 2006 under the name edos.debian.net is now operating again
>
> great ne
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:06:10AM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2014-05-23, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > yes. I didn't keep this in the new version since I felt that these weather
> > icons are more of a gimmick than really useful. The important information
> > is in the numbers displayed on the sum
Hi Ralf,
On Donnerstag, 22. Mai 2014, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > the analysis of not-installable packages due to dependency issues that
> > we did since 2006 under the name edos.debian.net is now operating again
great news indeed, thanks for all your work on this!
> I'd suggest two things:
> -
On 2014-05-23, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> yes. I didn't keep this in the new version since I felt that these weather
> icons are more of a gimmick than really useful. The important information
> is in the numbers displayed on the summary table, and in the detailed
> explanations.
We have packages in s
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 09:35:05AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 4:10 AM, Ralf Treinen wrote:
>
> > If you have other ideas of what could be useful to add
>
> The Debian Weather seems to be missing from the new site, old one:
>
> http://edos.debian.net/weather/
yes. I didn't
Hi Joachim,
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:36:27PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> It’s hard to say what is missing, but I find the web page not very
> practical for daily use – compared to, say,
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/. In particular, I’d need a compact
> view that shows that status of
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 4:10 AM, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> If you have other ideas of what could be useful to add
The Debian Weather seems to be missing from the new site, old one:
http://edos.debian.net/weather/
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-d
Hi Ralf,
Am Donnerstag, den 22.05.2014, 22:10 +0200 schrieb Ralf Treinen:
> There are still some features that I would like to add, like automatically
> recognizing cases that are related to ongoing transitions, or related
> bug reports, but that is for the future. If you have other ideas of what
Hi Ralf,
Ralf Treinen (2014-05-22):
> Hello,
>
> the analysis of not-installable packages due to dependency issues that
> we did since 2006 under the name edos.debian.net is now operating again
> at [1]. What is new:
[…]
>
> [1] qa.debian.org/dose
great news!
I'd suggest two things:
- maybe
Hello,
the analysis of not-installable packages due to dependency issues that
we did since 2006 under the name edos.debian.net is now operating again
at [1]. What is new:
- it now uses the dose-debcheck tool from the dose suite, which is
multiarch-aware
- it has much improved explanations of no
14 matches
Mail list logo
