Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> He needs to ship it with whatever should be the default. Only if
> the default has to be changed should dpkg-statoverride be used,
> which can be either because the local admin wants something different,
> or because a debconf or postinst script asked
Previously Steve Greenland wrote:
> Okay, now *I'm* confused. If dpkg is getting the default permissions
> from the package itself, doesn't that imply that Rob needs to ship the
> file "properly sgid mail"?
He needs to ship it with whatever should be the default. Only if
the default has to be chan
On 02-May-01, 09:37 (CDT), Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Previously Rob Browning wrote:
> > I realized that maybe dpkg-statoverride was only intended for
> > the local admin, and that I should just ship my file properly sgid
> > mail. So which interpretation is correct?
>
> Neith
Previously Rob Browning wrote:
> I realized that maybe dpkg-statoverride was only intended for
> the local admin, and that I should just ship my file properly sgid
> mail. So which interpretation is correct?
Neither :). The reason you always had to call suidregister was that
that was also the mom
Are there any other docs than the manpage. I think I may have
misinterpreted them (some elaboration there would be helpful).
What's the proper usage of dpkg-statoverride? lintian told me that I
should kill off emacs20's usage of suidregister in favor of
dpkg-statoverride, so I presumed that mea
5 matches
Mail list logo
