On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 07:52:04PM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 01:29:19PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 02:12:25PM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> > > Rather 'chmod +x /usr/bin/make' according to the error message. Weird.
> >
> > It is a confusi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 11 August 2002 20:03, Paul Cupis wrote:
> On Sunday 11 August 2002 18:52, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> > % chmod a-x debian/rules
>
> *Ahem*
>
> chmod a+x debian/rules
Never mind.
/me smacks himself
Paul Cupis
- --
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN
On 11/08/2002 Daniel Kobras wrote:
> % chmod a+x debian/rules
> % sudo chmod a-x /usr/bin/make
First line right, second is moronic. /usr/bin/make is a binary, it must
be executable.
bye
mejo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 11 August 2002 18:52, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> % chmod a-x debian/rules
*Ahem*
chmod a+x debian/rules
Paul Cupis
- --
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9VrUQIzuKV+SHX/kRAuugAJ9rpyEw
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 01:29:19PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 02:12:25PM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> > Rather 'chmod +x /usr/bin/make' according to the error message. Weird.
>
> It is a confusing (confused) error message. The permission problem is with
> the script,
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 02:12:25PM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 02:05:23PM +0200, Bart Schuller wrote:
> >
> > chmod +x debian/rules
>
> Rather 'chmod +x /usr/bin/make' according to the error message. Weird.
It is a confusing (confused) error message. The permission p
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 11:54:34PM +1200, Adam Warner wrote:
> Could someone please help me interpret this clisp 2.28 build error:
>
> $dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot
> dpkg-buildpackage: source package is clisp
> dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 1:2.28-1
> dpkg-buildpackage: source maintainer
Hi Bart Schuller,
>> sh: debian/rules: /usr/bin/make: bad interpreter: Permission denied
>
> chmod +x debian/rules
Of course! Thanks Bart and Daniel.
The resulting diff of debian/rules to compile in POSIX regular expression
support for CLISP is below.
28a29
> --with-module=rege
8 matches
Mail list logo