On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 01:43:12PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 07:54:53PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > Because libbfd does not have a stable ABI suitable for public use, nor is
> > > there currently a way to express a dependency on this library without
> > > thi
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 07:54:53PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > Because libbfd does not have a stable ABI suitable for public use, nor is
> > there currently a way to express a dependency on this library without
> > things breaking (you can't depend on "binutils" and have any guarantee of
>
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 10:36:05AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 12:24:28PM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote:
> > The package description for binutils-dev says the following:
>
> > >Description: The GNU binary utilities (BFD development files) This
> > > package includes header
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 12:24:28PM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote:
> The package description for binutils-dev says the following:
> >Description: The GNU binary utilities (BFD development files) This
> > package includes header files and static libraries necessary to build
> > programs which use the
The package description for binutils-dev says the following:
>Description: The GNU binary utilities (BFD development files) This
> package includes header files and static libraries necessary to build
> programs which use the GNU BFD library, which is part of binutils.
> Note that building Debian
5 matches
Mail list logo
