Re: dep3 nit-picks

2009-11-05 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Thu, 05 Nov 2009, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > I assume the goal is to imply both "i've read it" and "i approve it" > with a single header, right? Yes. > Since i know of no single word for this, i'd be fine with explicitly > stating that is the intent in DEP-3 description of the Reviewed-By >

Re: dep3 nit-picks

2009-11-05 Thread James Vega
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > [ moving to -devel from a private discussion to have more feedback ] > > Daniel was asking me how several unstructured paragraphs are supposed to > be treated for the Description field. I told him that the description is > the concatenation

Re: dep3 nit-picks

2009-11-05 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On 11/05/2009 04:44 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > It has an implicit meaning of approval yes. If the review was negative, it > should not be added or it should be clarified in the Description what the > reviewer's comments were (always a good idea). > > Proposition of patches welcome. Please search

Re: dep3 nit-picks

2009-11-05 Thread Raphael Hertzog
[ moving to -devel from a private discussion to have more feedback ] Daniel was asking me how several unstructured paragraphs are supposed to be treated for the Description field. I told him that the description is the concatenation of all of them. Do other people agree with Daniel that the points