-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 01:48:46PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> On 15/01/16 14:20, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 11:08:35AM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> >> On 15/01/16 04:00, Paul Wise wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 5:42 PM, Dan
Daniel Pocock writes:
> On 15/01/16 14:20, Bas Wijnen wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 11:08:35AM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>> If there are meta-packages (e.g. sip-client, xmpp-client), should
>>> any softphone be able to assert that it provides sip-client? Or
>>> should there be some quality
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 15/01/16 14:20, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 11:08:35AM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>
>> On 15/01/16 04:00, Paul Wise wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 5:42 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>>
default softphone in Debian[1]
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 11:08:35AM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>
> On 15/01/16 04:00, Paul Wise wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 5:42 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> >
> >> default softphone in Debian[1]
> >
> > It should be up to the user what comm
On 15/01/16 04:00, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 5:42 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>> default softphone in Debian[1]
>
> It should be up to the user what communications tools they want to use
> and or have installed (if any), that is none of our business, other
> than perhaps informi
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 5:42 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> default softphone in Debian[1]
It should be up to the user what communications tools they want to use
and or have installed (if any), that is none of our business, other
than perhaps informing them of the security properties of what is
avail
On 14/01/16 20:00, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 07:29:48PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> On 14/01/16 17:10, Iain R. Learmonth wrote:
>>> It would make sense that if upstreams for desktop environments do not
>>> recommend a softphone, that Debian includes a softphone with the de
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 07:29:48PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> On 14/01/16 17:10, Iain R. Learmonth wrote:
> > It would make sense that if upstreams for desktop environments do not
> > recommend a softphone, that Debian includes a softphone with the desktop
> > environment's task package that is
On 14/01/16 17:10, Iain R. Learmonth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:42:06AM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> Nothing really changed, the thread appeared to fizzle out with comments
>> from more than one person that Debian would ship whatever was
>> recommended by the desktop maintaine
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:42:06AM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> Nothing really changed, the thread appeared to fizzle out with comments
> from more than one person that Debian would ship whatever was
> recommended by the desktop maintainers / GNOME upstream[2]
I think for the best desktop in
Before the jessie release, I started a thread about the default
softphone in Debian[1]
Nothing really changed, the thread appeared to fizzle out with comments
from more than one person that Debian would ship whatever was
recommended by the desktop maintainers / GNOME upstream[2]
GNOME upstream h
11 matches
Mail list logo
