On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 03:55:36PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Thanks to base64, I never forward any windows virus to myself, they
> are kept in my ~/mail directory. See my ~/pmrc/executables in master
> for generic anti windows-executable recipes.
I recently found this other source of procmail
also sprach Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.07.1555 +0200]:
> Why bother to forward those messages to your mail server at all?
> The same base64 string you are using in postfix's body_checks will
> surely serve in your .procmailrc in master.
Because master is not the only machine that f
On Sat, 7 May 2005, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.07.1506 +0200]:
> > You should really accept messages from master before trying to
> > reject spam, i.e. use some kind of whitelist for master. If that's
> > not possible, don't forward email to suc
> > :0
> > |/usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -f'<>' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
procmail: Executing "/usr/sbin/sendmail,-f'<>',[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
exim: '<>' - bad address: malformed address: ' may not follow '<>
It seems to work without quotes though.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the lis
also sprach Miquel van Smoorenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.07.1451 +0200]:
> Why not configure your mailserver to just /dev/null spam/viruses
> that originate from your debian.org address.
>
> You could put this in your .procmailrc:
>
> :0
> |/usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -f'<>' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
also sprach Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.07.1506 +0200]:
> You should really accept messages from master before trying to
> reject spam, i.e. use some kind of whitelist for master. If that's
> not possible, don't forward email to such address.
The stuff my mail server rejects is 100%
On Sat, 7 May 2005, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.07.1403 +0200]:
> > Why are you so much worried about the envelope sender, when it is
> > usually forged? You are not trying to bounce messages that you
> > didn't want to receive back to the sender
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>also sprach Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.07.1403 +0200]:
>> Why are you so much worried about the envelope sender, when it is
>> usually forged? You are not trying to bounce messages that you
>> didn't want t
also sprach Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.07.1403 +0200]:
> Why are you so much worried about the envelope sender, when it is
> usually forged? You are not trying to bounce messages that you
> didn't want to receive back to the sender, are you? (that would be
> bounce-spam).
Well, sur
On Sat, 7 May 2005, martin f krafft wrote:
> I am trying to switch to procmail on master, which involves putting
> a proper ~/.procmailrc in place and nothing else.
>
> However, a major problem arises due to spam. My last rule forwards
> remaining mails to my normal email address, using the stand
I am trying to switch to procmail on master, which involves putting
a proper ~/.procmailrc in place and nothing else.
However, a major problem arises due to spam. My last rule forwards
remaining mails to my normal email address, using the standard mail
forwarding syntax:
:0
! [EMAIL PROTECTED
11 matches
Mail list logo
