On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 5:55 AM, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 04:50:38AM -0700, Jose R R wrote:
>> First I modify debian/rules, option: --enable-fb
>>
---
--with-tests=regular or --with-tests=coverage ... AND you then also have to
> > do "make check" to compile AND run them... it requires effort to enable
> > them and run them.
>
> He's attempting to use the packaging from Debian experimental, which
> enables &
t; "make check" to compile AND run them... it requires effort to enable them and
> run them.
He's attempting to use the packaging from Debian experimental, which
enables & automatically runs make check.
> > override_dh_auto_configure:
> > dh_auto_
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 04:50:38AM -0700, Jose R R wrote:
> First I modify debian/rules, option: --enable-fb
> -
> [...]
> ifeq (linux,$(DEB_HOST_ARCH_OS))
On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 00:21:38 -0700 Jose R R said:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 10:56 PM, Carsten Haitzler
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 04:50:38 -0700 Jose R R said:
> >
> >> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 4:55 PM, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> > Oh I see - I misunderstood your previous mess
Hello,
I just saw your initial log and the one in the mail. Is it possible that
you have some other installed library that gets mixed into your build?
Or some lower binary / library is currupted?
There are a few things that indicate it:
- In the first log the linker cannot find _efl_object_init_
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 10:56 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 04:50:38 -0700 Jose R R said:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 4:55 PM, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
>> [...]
>> > Oh I see - I misunderstood your previous message and thought you were
>> > targeting sid. You need to backport
On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 04:50:38 -0700 Jose R R said:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 4:55 PM, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> [...]
> > Oh I see - I misunderstood your previous message and thought you were
> > targeting sid. You need to backport + rebuild for jessie. IIRC, the
> > only change I needed was to
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 04:44:53PM -0700, Jose R R wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 1:19 PM, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 11:47:39PM -0700, Jose R R wrote:
> > > https://git.enlightenment.org/core/efl.git/
> > >
> > > Notwithstanding, I intended to package Enlightenment a
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 1:19 PM, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 11:47:39PM -0700, Jose R R wrote:
> > https://git.enlightenment.org/core/efl.git/
> >
> > Notwithstanding, I intended to package Enlightenment and make download
> > available for my SourceForge Debian-Reiser4 netbo
On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 11:47:39PM -0700, Jose R R wrote:
> https://git.enlightenment.org/core/efl.git/
>
> Notwithstanding, I intended to package Enlightenment and make download
> available for my SourceForge Debian-Reiser4 netboot installer.
>
> EFL debian packaging:
> http://http.debian.net/de
Hi,
I have updated Net::DNS in experimental to version 0.77.
There were some significant changes in the upstream version 0.69/0.70,
so I would appreciate if you can test your perl packages if they still
work with
libnet-dns-perl 0.77.
I know that at least fpdns[1] is broken, but I would expect t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
(This thread is better suited for debian-mentors, setting
mail-followup-to accordingly)
Le 08/10/2012 18:30, Andrej N. Gritsenko a écrit :
> Hello!
>
> I have a question. Since maintainers of LXDE are extremely busy
> last few months I would like t
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Andrej N. Gritsenko wrote:
> I have a question. Since maintainers of LXDE are extremely busy last
Perhaps you would like to join the LXDE package maintainers team and
help them out? They don't appear to be using the pkg-lxde group on
alioth though, so best con
Andrej N. Gritsenko wrote:
[new LXDE]
>So question is - may it be possible to upload them into experimental
> or I have still to bother maintainers? I feel sorry to do that again.
Hello,
an upload to experimental needs to be signed by a Debian Developer[1],
there is no real difference to upl
Hello!
I have a question. Since maintainers of LXDE are extremely busy last
few months I would like to find a way to upload latest upstream version
of libfm and pcmanfm into experimental repository. I feel sorry that I
constantly bug the maintainers with the same question and I think they
Forwarding to debian-devel too.
> Hi,
>
> The recent release candidate 1 for GnuPG 1.4.10 has been packaged and
> uploaded
> to Debian's "experimental" distribution, in order to facilitate testing. If
> you wish, please try it out and of course report bugs found. All cautions
> around release
2005-12-30 21:03 +0100, Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Le Ven 30 Décembre 2005 17:06, Kurt Roeckx a écrit :
> > On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 04:48:06PM +0100, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ experimenta
Le Ven 30 Décembre 2005 17:06, Kurt Roeckx a écrit :
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 04:48:06PM +0100, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ experimental main contrib
> > non-free deb-src http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ experimental main
>
On 30/12/05, Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So why do you use ftp.debian.org and not ftp.pl.debian.org for
> experimental?
Now I use ftp.pl.debian.org.
> > http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/experimental/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz:
> > 404 Not Found
>
> So ftp.debian.org seems to be b
On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 04:48:06PM +0100, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ experimental main contrib non-free
> deb-src http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ experimental main contrib non-free
So why do you use ftp.debian.org and not ftp.pl.debian.org for
deb http://ftp.pl.debian.org/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free
deb-src http://ftp.pl.debian.org/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free
deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free
deb-src http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free
deb http://ftp.debian.o
On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 04:12:23PM +0100, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> I have noticed that directory
> debian/dists/experimental/main/binary-i386 is empty.
> Where is new "experimental" repository?
Unless there is a problem with the mirror you are using that directory
should contain a Release and P
On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 04:12:23PM +0100, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have noticed that directory
> debian/dists/experimental/main/binary-i386 is empty.
> Where is new "experimental" repository?
-rw-r--r-- 1 mirror mirror 1288427 2005-12-29 21:14 Packages
drwxr-sr-x 2 mirror mirror
Hi,
I have noticed that directory
debian/dists/experimental/main/binary-i386 is empty.
Where is new "experimental" repository?
Regards,
Michal Piotrowski
In response to the Request For Package (RFP) #280209, [1]_ I've hacked
up a quick codeville package. The diff is attached. There are some
debian-legal matters concerning Open Source License v2.0 (and even
v2.1), so it'll probably end up in non-free (not that I agree with
these legal banterings at
On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 23:50, Kenshi Muto wrote:
> Oliver Elphick wrote:
> > Debian packages of PostgreSQL 7.4beta4 are available in the experimental
> > section of the Debian archive.
>
> Could you consider changing templates to po-debconf style? (Bug#195248)
I'm quite open to doing that, save fo
Hi,
At Fri, 10 Oct 2003 21:36:35 +0100,
Oliver Elphick wrote:
> Debian packages of PostgreSQL 7.4beta4 are available in the experimental
> section of the Debian archive.
Could you consider changing templates to po-debconf style? (Bug#195248)
Thanks,
--
Kenshi Muto
28 matches
Mail list logo
