* Oleksandr Moskalenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-09 12:56:03 -0600]:
> According to the chapter 3.3 of the Dev. reference the GR calls for votes
> should've been sent to the debian-devel-announce, but in reality they weren't.
> It seems that the only way to get those
On Mon, 09 Oct 2006, Oleksandr Moskalenko wrote:
> According to the chapter 3.3 of the Dev. reference the GR calls for votes
> should've been sent to the debian-devel-announce, but in reality they weren't.
They *were* sent to the d-d-a mailinglist, check the archives.
--
&
Oleksandr Moskalenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> According to the chapter 3.3 of the Dev. reference the GR calls for votes
> should've been sent to the debian-devel-announce, but in reality they weren't.
> It seems that the only way to get those would be to subscri
On Mon, 9 Oct 2006 12:56:03 -0600, Oleksandr Moskalenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> According to the chapter 3.3 of the Dev. reference the GR calls for
The dev ref is not authoritative on voting procedure.
> votes should've been sent to the debian-devel-announce, but
On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 12:56 -0600, Oleksandr Moskalenko wrote:
> According to the chapter 3.3 of the Dev. reference the GR calls for votes
> should've been sent to the debian-devel-announce, but in reality they weren't.
> It seems that the only way to get those would be to subsc
This one time, at band camp, Oleksandr Moskalenko said:
> According to the chapter 3.3 of the Dev. reference the GR calls for votes
> should've been sent to the debian-devel-announce, but in reality they weren't.
> It seems that the only way to get those would be to subscribe
According to the chapter 3.3 of the Dev. reference the GR calls for votes
should've been sent to the debian-devel-announce, but in reality they weren't.
It seems that the only way to get those would be to subscribe to debian-vote
or to trawl the debian-vote archives. Why is it so?
Rega
Cryptic message and, if that meant that you joined Canonical, definitely
the wrong venue to announce it. Use your blog via the Planet for that.
On Fri, September 1, 2006 3:23, Adeodato Simó said:
> Puedo morir en paz.
> I just shook hands with my Benevolent Dictator.
> 20060831171819+"CEST" is n
On Wednesday 18 January 2006 18:07, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Posting permissions to debian-devel-announce revoked after making a
> point.
[public announcmement of the above on d-d-a]
Thank you very much. Very well written.
-- vbi
--
The early bird gets the coffee left over from the
* Brendan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006:01:18 14:54 -0500]:
> This thread is a huge waste of bandwidth. Can't you boys compare pickles
> somewhere else? This gets, (what's the expression?) a big ole fat PLONK.
Sorry sweetie, I'm not a boy and have no pickle to compare.
--
off the chain like a rebe
This thread is a huge waste of bandwidth. Can't you boys compare pickles
somewhere else? This gets, (what's the expression?) a big ole fat PLONK.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006:01:18 20:23 +0100]:
> Michael Poole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Joerg Jaspert writes:
> >> On 10538 March 1977, Martin Schulze wrote:
> >>> Since this mail also mentions Andrews sarcasti
Michael Poole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Joerg Jaspert writes:
>> On 10538 March 1977, Martin Schulze wrote:
>>> Since this mail also mentions Andrews sarcastic posting
>>> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/01/msg9.html I
>>> may
ed on public lists. Anything sent there should be treated as
> sensitive and not to be spread to other lists;"
>
> Ever read that?
>
> > Since this mail also mentions Andrews sarcastic posting
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/01/msg9.htmlI
>
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 06:25:07PM +, Dave Holland wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 06:44:32PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Raphaël has also harmed the project by implicitly
> > linking it to Ubuntu.
>
> Don't be ridiculous. Ubuntu explicitly acknowledge that they build on
> Debian - see
sensitive and not to be spread to other lists;"
Ever read that?
> Since this mail also mentions Andrews sarcastic posting
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/01/msg9.htmlI
> may lose posting permissions as well.
You should lose -private rights, as you clearly
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 06:44:32PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Raphaël has also harmed the project by implicitly
> linking it to Ubuntu.
Don't be ridiculous. Ubuntu explicitly acknowledge that they build on
Debian - see http://www.ubuntulinux.org/ubuntu/relationship - and Debian
positively en
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 06:44:32PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Sorry to feed again the troll, but I would like to know what is the
> rationale behind removing the permissions for Andrew and not for
> Raphaël.
This has nothing to do with the technical aspects of Debian development
(too bad th
Le mercredi 18 janvier 2006 à 18:07 +0100, Martin Schulze a écrit :
> Andrew Suffield has lost his posting permission to debian-devel-announce
> after making a rather sarcastic point that off-topic mails to this list are
> unwanted.
Sorry to feed again the troll, but I would like to kno
19 matches
Mail list logo
