gt; to
> > fix it.
> You can prepare a NMU yourself and ask for sponsorship as usual.
I have an NMU ready for review: could you or someone else take a look at
it? It is located at https://mentors.debian.net/package/debdelta/.
This is my first NMU, so I don't know if everythi
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 12:52:30PM -0500, Calum McConnell wrote:
> Hi all,
> I just wanted to note the breakage, and ask for an NMU. I have prepared
> and uploaded a patch, both to Salsa and to the BTS, and it has been a few
> days without any response. The patch is very simple: just replace all
Hi all,
I just wanted to note the breakage, and ask for an NMU. I have prepared
and uploaded a patch, both to Salsa and to the BTS, and it has been a few
days without any response. The patch is very simple: just replace all
occurences of isAlive() with is_alive(), and the package works. I am not
dear all,
sorry, I had completely forgotten that the debdelta signing key was to
expire on 20th August; I have issued a new one; to import it, save it
from attachment and issue, as root
# gpg --home /etc/debdelta/gnupg/ --import 2012_signed.key
I will upload a new 'debdelta' package
dear all,
I just uploaded 'debdelta' version 0.45, that has a better
implementation of error logs , and a provision for (automatically)
sending them to the main server (where I will be able to look at them) .
Brief explanation. A 'forensic file' is a file listing the content
am writing documentation, it is at
http://debdelta.debian.net/html/index.html (it is still work in
progress); I just added a section 3.9 that may be of interest; I sent an
email debian-dak@l.d.o .
There will also be a session at
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/foundations-o-debdelta/
i
Dear all,
I just uploaded into experimental a new version 0.42exp of debdelta (
you may find some binaries also in [3] ).
This version adds an experimental feature : if you call
'debdelta-upgrade' with the option '--format=unzipped' , then in the
recreated deb the data.
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 06:03:42PM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
> The debdelta repository 'debdeltas.debian.net' has a new home! I thank
> a lot 'md' for hosting it in ftp.linux.it; and also 'ansgar' ,
> 'formorer' for offering a host.
>
> With
The debdelta repository 'debdeltas.debian.net' has a new home! I thank
a lot 'md' for hosting it in ftp.linux.it; and also 'ansgar' ,
'formorer' for offering a host.
With a new server, the service should also be better: deltas should be
available no more
A Mennucc schrieb am Tuesday, den 03. May 2011:
Hi,
> the debdelta service is experiencing some problems.
>
> There are two hosts involved: the first creates the deltas, and the
> second is a public http server 'bononia' that serves them (under a
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi there,
the debdelta service is experiencing some problems.
There are two hosts involved: the first creates the deltas, and the
second is a public http server 'bononia' that serves them (under a
virtual host by the CNAME debdeltas.
, so it will be back
>> online as soon as it generates all needed deltas.
>
> Question: How much space does debdelta take? (per architecture?)
currently I am creating deltas for amd64 and i386, and for
lenny squeeze sid experimental ;
there are ~14000 deltas , the total size of de
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 22/09/2010 22:46, A Mennucc ha scritto:
> due to my PC running out of disk space, no deltas were generated in the
> last week
It seems that there was another problem: there is broken pdiff in
amd64/experimental, so that debmirror was not updating m
On 22 September 2010 22:46, A Mennucc wrote:
> due to my PC running out of disk space, no deltas were generated in the
> last week (while I was absent); I found more space, so it will be back
> online as soon as it generates all needed deltas.
Question: How much space does debdelta t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
dear all,
due to my PC running out of disk space, no deltas were generated in the
last week (while I was absent); I found more space, so it will be back
online as soon as it generates all needed deltas.
If you do not know what debdelta is , see
http
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Die, 04 Sep 2007, Florent Rougon wrote:
>> > Sorry, I can't remember the name of the package.
>>
>> That must be cm-super.
> Yup, cm-super does this trick. I once wanted to undo this and ship the
> font files directly, but got quite a lot of requ
On Die, 04 Sep 2007, Florent Rougon wrote:
> > Sorry, I can't remember the name of the package.
>
> That must be cm-super.
Yup, cm-super does this trick. I once wanted to undo this and ship the
font files directly, but got quite a lot of requests why the packages
has gotten soo big.
>From the ru
Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, I can't remember the name of the package.
That must be cm-super.
--
Florent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Russ,
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A Mennucc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> BTW, I also encountered a strange "bug" : sometimes the md5sums file
>> contains MD5 of files that are not shipped. This is printed as a warning
>> in my server. If MD5 will become a release goal, this sh
A Mennucc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> BTW, I also encountered a strange "bug" : sometimes the md5sums file
> contains MD5 of files that are not shipped. This is printed as a warning
> in my server. If MD5 will become a release goal, this should be
> corrected as well : in case, I will send bug r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi
just for the record : "debdelta" uses md5sums (when available) as a way
to speed up delta creation, to rapidly detect if there are any identical
files in the archives. So , yes, I (*) would be happy if md5sums where
always available
> reconstructed by "debpatch" would be different with the original in 2
>> bytes.
>
> Two bytes?
a .deb file is an "ar" archive containing both a control.tar.gz and a
data.tar.gz
BTW: let me remind that one goal of debdelta is to obtain "perfect
reconstruction&qu
1g, this changed the .deb files. So a file
> reconstructed by "debpatch" would be different with the original in 2
> bytes.
Two bytes?
> I have added a workaround for that problem in 'debdelta' version 0.21 ,
> and I have installed it in the server that prepare
hi all,
about two weeks ago 'debdelta-upgrade' started failing. Unfortunately I
was away with (almost) no Internet access. Today I could finally fix the
problem.
The problem was due to a subtle change in zlib1g: in newer versions, the
compressed output has 0x02 instead of 0x00 at the
Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
The command 'debdelta-upgrade' is meant to be run between 'apt-get
update' and 'apt-get upgrade'; it downloads .debdelta files and
recreate the new .deb files from them; always using the *installed* old
version of the .deb, and not
> The command 'debdelta-upgrade' is meant to be run between 'apt-get
> update' and 'apt-get upgrade'; it downloads .debdelta files and
> recreate the new .deb files from them; always using the *installed* old
> version of the .deb, and not the old .deb
also sprach A Mennucc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.05.31.1706 +0200]:
> I have completed a reasonably working version of 'debdelta', a package
> suite to compute differences between Debian packages.
Nice. I assume you saw
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/05/msg02676.h
Dear Debian people,
I have completed a reasonably working version of 'debdelta', a package
suite to compute differences between Debian packages.
For sake of clarity, let's call '.debdelta' a file that encodes
the differences between Debian packages, and '.deb&#
hi
I recollected my earlier experiments on computing package diffs, and
prepared a package called 'debdelta'. It is available at
http://tonelli.sns.it/pub/mennucc1/debdelta and also uploaded into
experimental.
This package contains both a command 'debdelta', to comp
29 matches
Mail list logo
