* Gerrit Pape :
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 04:34:25PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Gerrit Pape writes ("Re: dash Debian package - RC bugs"):
> > > I can't help, I don't understand. I yesterday followed up to a mail
> > > that was additionally
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 04:34:25PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Gerrit Pape writes ("Re: dash Debian package - RC bugs"):
> > I can't help, I don't understand. I yesterday followed up to a mail
> > that was additionally addressed to the
> > mailing list a
Gerrit Pape writes ("Re: dash Debian package - RC bugs"):
> I can't help, I don't understand. I yesterday followed up to a mail
> that was additionally addressed to the
> mailing list and got an automatic reply telling me that the mail cannot
> be delivered be
On Ma, 31 aug 10, 15:23:26, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
>
> Obvious fail. The list is read only as the communication has to go trough the
> BTS.
Not according to the description:
,[ http://lists.debian.org/debian-ctte/ ]
| Debian Technical Committee
| Public meeting, business and announcements of
On 08/31/2010 02:08 PM, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 08:28:57AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>> [ It sucks to have to confirm mails for debian-package-d...@list.smarden.org
>> ]
>
> I can't help, I don't understand. I yesterday followed up to a mail
> that was additionally addre
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 08:28:57AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> [ It sucks to have to confirm mails for debian-package-d...@list.smarden.org ]
I can't help, I don't understand. I yesterday followed up to a mail
that was additionally addressed to the
mailing list and got an automatic reply tel
[ It sucks to have to confirm mails for debian-package-d...@list.smarden.org ]
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > What happened to the idea of having /bin/sh -> dash hardcoded in the dash
> > package instead ?
>
> That's still the plan. The problem is that once dash is the only
> pa
Raphael Geissert writes:
> That's still the plan. The problem is that once dash is the only package
> shipping /bin/sh, bash would be the one prompting the user whether
> she/he wants to use bash (so that the diversion is added) it would still
> break in case the user already added a local divers
On 29 April 2010 14:23, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Apr 2010, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>> Any dpkg maintainer reading? Raphaël? Guillem?
>
> Yes, but I don't know what you expect from me. That discussion dragged for
> far too long in too many directions.
Hum, ok. That's why I didn't CC the
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Any dpkg maintainer reading? Raphaël? Guillem?
Yes, but I don't know what you expect from me. That discussion dragged for
far too long in too many directions.
What happened to the idea of having /bin/sh -> dash hardcoded in the dash
package instead ?
Hi Ben,
On 29 April 2010 12:15, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:24:32AM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> [...]
>> A quick workaround to bypass the check, in case you want to upload
>> already, would be to: ddivert=dpkg; ddivert="${ddivert}-divert";
>> $ddivert --remove ...
>>
>>
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:24:32AM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
[...]
> A quick workaround to bypass the check, in case you want to upload
> already, would be to: ddivert=dpkg; ddivert="${ddivert}-divert";
> $ddivert --remove ...
>
> [1] http://git.debian.org/?p=users/geissert/dash.git;a=summary
On 28 April 2010 16:08, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 03:20:12PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>> On 15 April 2010 12:58, Gerrit Pape wrote:
>> I tried to clone your git repository but it 404s, so I can't check
>> what other changes you've made so far and see if there's any confli
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 03:20:12PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> On 15 April 2010 12:58, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> > Raphael sent a mail rudimentarily stating how to proceed. I must
> > confess, I don't really understand the plan, or why it should be done
> > this way. But I might miss information
On 15 April 2010 12:58, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> Raphael sent a mail rudimentarily stating how to proceed. I must
> confess, I don't really understand the plan, or why it should be done
> this way. But I might miss information since I was not available when
> the /bin/sh transition was discussed, pl
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:41:03PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> Why are you not using alioth for this?
It's less work for me, I haven't used alioth before.
Regards, Gerrit.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact list
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 09:13:04PM +0100, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> I set up a mailing list to coordinate work on the dash package. If
> you're interested in helping, please subscribe to the
> mailing list by sending an email to
> , and start to discuss
> and contribute. Thanks for your help.
Why ar
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 01:59:45PM +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> On 15/04/2010 19:58, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> > Hi, unfortunately my email didn't attract many contributors, i.e. no one
> > but Raphael subscribed to the list.
>
> Is there a way to look at the archive of your ML (the message of Rapha
On 15/04/2010 19:58, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 09:13:04PM +0100, Gerrit Pape wrote:
>> I set up a mailing list to coordinate work on the dash package. If
>> you're interested in helping, please subscribe to the
>> mailing list by sending an email to
>> , and start to discuss
>>
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 09:13:04PM +0100, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> I'm looking for volunteers that are willing to help with maintaining
> dash. Most of the work is relaying bug reports to upstream, judging and
> including prospective fixes if upstream is unresponsive, preparing
> patches for bugs, and
Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> There’s still
> • drop dash
> • just manage the symlink, no diversions
The plan is to make dash the only package providing /bin/sh. bash and other
pet shells would then divert the symlink upon installation.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer
www.debian.org -
[Thorsten Glaser]
> JFTR, Clint Adams and I have been working to get posh up to the task
> of being a /bin/sh as well, so any solution should be able to not
> only have GNU bash and dash and mksh as /bin/sh but also,
> eventually, posh and ksh93 (if they add an “alias local=typeset”
> builtin at l
Raphael Geissert debian.org> writes:
> The shared debconf prompt idea was already discussed and discarded in one of
> the d-devel threads
Ah, okay. Didn’t know that.
> before the change was made. Which is what Thorsten's
> idea was all about.
Well, I hope you’ve got some better idea then ☺
Hi Gerrit,
Gerrit Pape wrote:
>
> dash has outstanding RC bugs. Some are a left-over from the /bin/sh
> transition from bash to dash, and still unresolved. IIRC Thorsten
> Glaser had some ideas on how to proceed, but we never discussed anything
> in this regard. Luk Claes and Raphael Geissert
Hi,
I find myself to have from time to time less spare time and/or
motivation than some of the packages I maintain deserve. So the dash
Debian package.
I'm looking for volunteers that are willing to help with maintaining
dash. Most of the work is relaying bug reports to upstream, judging and
in
25 matches
Mail list logo
