Chris Fearnley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But what does FSSTND say about subdirectories of /usr/bin? I would
> hate to have the mh utilities stored in with the illions of programs
> already in /usr/bin. And where would the netpbm tools be stored [I
> dislike Red Hat's solution of all >100 util
'Bill Mitchell wrote:'
>
>Scott Blachowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>> Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > I agree. But, now you see that we have a script called /usr/bin/aout
>> > and a potential directory called /usr/bin/aout. Hence my suggestion
>> > that it ought to be called s
"Peter Tobias" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > There should be no subdirectories within /bin.
> > Given the intention of FSSTND compliance, this is an absolute
> > prohibition.
> They're just talking about /bin and not /usr/bin.
Oops. Right.
> From @mongo.pixar.com:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 28 16:35:58 1995
> Old-Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 28 Nov 1995 07:32:38 -0800 (PST)
> From: Bill Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: conveni
Scott Blachowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I agree. But, now you see that we have a script called /usr/bin/aout
> > and a potential directory called /usr/bin/aout. Hence my suggestion
> > that it ought to be called something else. with-aout perhap
Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree. But, now you see that we have a script called /usr/bin/aout
> and a potential directory called /usr/bin/aout. Hence my suggestion
> that it ought to be called something else. with-aout perhaps.
[For what it's worth... :-))]
Actually, I would a
Bill Mitchell writes ("Re: convenience script for building a.out packages"):
> I don't see the conflict between a program name in /usr/local/bin and
> a directory name in /usr/bin. I'll happily change my local program
> name to something else, but I don't unders
On Wed, 22 Nov 1995, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Bill Mitchell writes ("convenience script for building a.out packages"):
> > This is a script I've placed in /usr/local/bin/aout on my system.
> > It's intended as an aid in building a.out packages on an
> >
Bill Mitchell writes ("convenience script for building a.out packages"):
> This is a script I've placed in /usr/local/bin/aout on my system.
> It's intended as an aid in building a.out packages on an
> elf-ized debian system. It's invoked as:
>
> aout
This is a script I've placed in /usr/local/bin/aout on my system.
It's intended as an aid in building a.out packages on an
elf-ized debian system. It's invoked as:
aout { normal command line }
#!/bin/sh
PATH=/usr/i486-linuxaout/bin:$PATH
"$@"
10 matches
Mail list logo