Re: convenience script for building a.out packages

1995-11-28 Thread Scott Blachowicz
Chris Fearnley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But what does FSSTND say about subdirectories of /usr/bin? I would > hate to have the mh utilities stored in with the illions of programs > already in /usr/bin. And where would the netpbm tools be stored [I > dislike Red Hat's solution of all >100 util

Re: convenience script for building a.out packages

1995-11-28 Thread Chris Fearnley
'Bill Mitchell wrote:' > >Scott Blachowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > >> Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > I agree. But, now you see that we have a script called /usr/bin/aout >> > and a potential directory called /usr/bin/aout. Hence my suggestion >> > that it ought to be called s

Re: convenience script for building a.out packages

1995-11-28 Thread Bill Mitchell
"Peter Tobias" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > There should be no subdirectories within /bin. > > Given the intention of FSSTND compliance, this is an absolute > > prohibition. > They're just talking about /bin and not /usr/bin. Oops. Right.

Re: convenience script for building a.out packages

1995-11-28 Thread Jean-Marc Bourguet
> From @mongo.pixar.com:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 28 16:35:58 1995 > Old-Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 28 Nov 1995 07:32:38 -0800 (PST) > From: Bill Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: conveni

Re: convenience script for building a.out packages

1995-11-28 Thread Bill Mitchell
Scott Blachowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I agree. But, now you see that we have a script called /usr/bin/aout > > and a potential directory called /usr/bin/aout. Hence my suggestion > > that it ought to be called something else. with-aout perhap

Re: convenience script for building a.out packages

1995-11-27 Thread Scott Blachowicz
Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I agree. But, now you see that we have a script called /usr/bin/aout > and a potential directory called /usr/bin/aout. Hence my suggestion > that it ought to be called something else. with-aout perhaps. [For what it's worth... :-))] Actually, I would a

Re: convenience script for building a.out packages

1995-11-23 Thread Ian Jackson
Bill Mitchell writes ("Re: convenience script for building a.out packages"): > I don't see the conflict between a program name in /usr/local/bin and > a directory name in /usr/bin. I'll happily change my local program > name to something else, but I don't unders

Re: convenience script for building a.out packages

1995-11-22 Thread Bill Mitchell
On Wed, 22 Nov 1995, Ian Jackson wrote: > Bill Mitchell writes ("convenience script for building a.out packages"): > > This is a script I've placed in /usr/local/bin/aout on my system. > > It's intended as an aid in building a.out packages on an > >

Re: convenience script for building a.out packages

1995-11-22 Thread Ian Jackson
Bill Mitchell writes ("convenience script for building a.out packages"): > This is a script I've placed in /usr/local/bin/aout on my system. > It's intended as an aid in building a.out packages on an > elf-ized debian system. It's invoked as: > > aout

convenience script for building a.out packages

1995-11-20 Thread Bill Mitchell
This is a script I've placed in /usr/local/bin/aout on my system. It's intended as an aid in building a.out packages on an elf-ized debian system. It's invoked as: aout { normal command line } #!/bin/sh PATH=/usr/i486-linuxaout/bin:$PATH "$@"