Re: contrib and nonfree distribs

2014-03-03 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 02:16:37PM +0100, Solal Rastier wrote: > The installer recommend "contrib" and "nonfree"... No, it does not. -- This end should point toward the ground if you want to go to space. If it starts pointing toward space you are having a bad problem and you will not go to spac

Re: contrib and nonfree distribs

2014-03-03 Thread forum : : für : : umläute
On 2014-03-03 14:56, forum::für::umläute wrote: > On 2014-03-03 14:16, Solal Rastier wrote: >> > The installer recommend "contrib" and "nonfree"... > so what are the consequences? does it force you to follow the > recommendations? this sounds a bit snarky, but is not (really) intended to do so. t

Re: contrib and nonfree distribs

2014-03-03 Thread forum : : für : : umläute
On 2014-03-03 14:16, Solal Rastier wrote: > The installer recommend "contrib" and "nonfree"... so what are the consequences? does it force you to follow the recommendations? btw, i never noticed that the installer recommends "contrib" or "nonfree". afair, i had to enable them manually. fgadmf IO

Re: contrib and nonfree distribs

2014-03-03 Thread Solal Rastier
Le 3 mars 2014 à 13:59, forum::für::umläute a écrit : > assuming for a second that you are not trolling, > > On 2014-02-28 12:56, Solal Rastier wrote: >> Further proof that Debian is proprietary software... >> > > hmm. > but since both "contrib" and "non-free" are not part of Debian, how does

Re: contrib and nonfree distribs

2014-03-03 Thread forum : : für : : umläute
assuming for a second that you are not trolling, On 2014-02-28 12:56, Solal Rastier wrote: > Further proof that Debian is proprietary software... > hmm. but since both "contrib" and "non-free" are not part of Debian, how does the existence of these sections lead to the conclusion that Debian is

Re: contrib and nonfree distribs

2014-03-01 Thread Javier Barroso
Hello, El 28/02/2014 11:36, "Solal Rastier" escribió: > > Why the "nonfree" and "contrib" distributions aren't removed? The reply was given at this thread. There are people that think like you (if you think that should be removed). See gnewsense [1], maybe you prefer that distro than Debian. Reg

Re: contrib and nonfree distribs

2014-02-28 Thread darkestkhan
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Solal Rastier wrote: > That's not an answer. For users, that doesn't change anything. > > Le 28 févr. 2014 à 15:20, Samuel Thibault a écrit : > >> Solal Rastier, le Fri 28 Feb 2014 12:56:00 +0100, a écrit : >>> Further proof that Debian is proprietary software...

Re: "contrib" and "nonfree" distribs

2014-02-28 Thread Sven Bartscher
On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 20:21:13 +0100 Bálint Réczey wrote: > Hi Solal, > > 2014-02-28 19:24 GMT+01:00 Solal Rastier : > > Le 28 févr. 2014 à 19:22, Octavio Alvarez a > > écrit : > > > >> On 02/28/2014 09:29 AM, Solal Rastier wrote: > > > My mail client top-posting automtically. I don't compare W

Re: "contrib" and "nonfree" distribs

2014-02-28 Thread Bálint Réczey
Hi Solal, 2014-02-28 19:24 GMT+01:00 Solal Rastier : > Le 28 févr. 2014 à 19:22, Octavio Alvarez a écrit > : > >> On 02/28/2014 09:29 AM, Solal Rastier wrote: > My mail client top-posting automtically. I don't compare Windows and Debian. > Windows is proprietariest than Debian, but Debian isn'

Re: "contrib" and "nonfree" distribs

2014-02-28 Thread Solal Rastier
Le 28 févr. 2014 à 19:22, Octavio Alvarez a écrit : > On 02/28/2014 09:29 AM, Solal Rastier wrote: >> I not compare Debian with Windows. The FSF publishes a GNU/Linux freedom >> indicator. Debian is proprietary, sorry. > > Ah! The FSF website [1] says otherwise. The FSF website acknowledges > D

Re: "contrib" and "nonfree" distribs

2014-02-28 Thread Solal Rastier
I not compare Debian with Windows. The FSF publishes a GNU/Linux freedom indicator. Debian is proprietary, sorry. Le 28 févr. 2014 à 18:24, Octavio Alvarez a écrit : > On 02/28/2014 05:18 AM, Solal Rastier wrote: >> 1. I'm not a troll >> 2. What is "top-post"? >> 3. Why I need stop? > > Hi, So

Re: contrib and nonfree distribs

2014-02-28 Thread Solal Rastier
That's not an answer. For users, that doesn't change anything. Le 28 févr. 2014 à 15:20, Samuel Thibault a écrit : > Solal Rastier, le Fri 28 Feb 2014 12:56:00 +0100, a écrit : >> Further proof that Debian is proprietary software... > > contrib and non-free are not part of Debian releases. Real

Re: "contrib" and "nonfree" distribs

2014-02-28 Thread Solal Rastier
1. I'm not a troll 2. What is "top-post"? 3. Why I need stop? Le 28 févr. 2014 à 13:10, Thibaut Paumard a écrit : > Le 28/02/2014 12:56, Solal Rastier a écrit : >> Further proof that Debian is proprietary software... > > I applause this almost inconspicuous troll attempt. > > Please don't top-

Re: contrib and nonfree distribs

2014-02-28 Thread Thibaut Paumard
Le 28/02/2014 12:56, Solal Rastier a écrit : > Further proof that Debian is proprietary software... I applause this almost inconspicuous troll attempt. Please don't top-post. http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html Regards. PS: full stop. > > Le 28 févr. 2014 à 12:46, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :

Re: contrib and nonfree distribs

2014-02-28 Thread Salvo Tomaselli
In data venerdì 28 febbraio 2014 10.35.15, Solal Rastier ha scritto: > Why the "nonfree" and "contrib" distributions aren't removed? don't feed the troll please -- Salvo Tomaselli "Io non mi sento obbligato a credere che lo stesso Dio che ci ha dotato di senso, ragione ed intelletto intendesse

Re: contrib and nonfree distribs

2014-02-28 Thread Solal Rastier
Further proof that Debian is proprietary software... Le 28 févr. 2014 à 12:46, Wouter Verhelst a écrit : > Op vrijdag 28 februari 2014 12:42:39 schreef u: >> The FSF believe documentation need to be free, and that's true... > > It is true that it needs to be free, but their license just isn't f

Re: contrib and nonfree distribs

2014-02-28 Thread Wouter Verhelst
Op vrijdag 28 februari 2014 10:35:15 schreef Solal Rastier: > Why the "nonfree" and "contrib" distributions aren't removed? Because unfortunately the free software foundation believes documentation doesn't need to be free, and we can't put non-free documentation in main. -- This end should poin

Re: contrib and nonfree distribs

2014-02-28 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Solal Rastier , 2014-02-28, 10:35: Why the "nonfree" and "contrib" distributions aren't removed? https://www.debian.org/vote/2004/vote_002 -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debi

Re: contrib and nonfree distribs

2014-02-28 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 28 février 2014 à 10:35 +0100, Solal Rastier a écrit : > Why the "nonfree" and "contrib" distributions aren't removed? Maybe because of http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=firmware-nonfree or http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=flashplugin-nonfree Cheers, -- .''`.Jo

Re: contrib and nonfree distribs

2014-02-28 Thread Andrew Shadura
Hello, On 28 February 2014 10:35, Solal Rastier wrote: > Why the "nonfree" and "contrib" distributions aren't removed? Could you please elaborate your question? -- Cheers, Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co

contrib and nonfree distribs

2014-02-28 Thread Solal Rastier
Why the "nonfree" and "contrib" distributions aren't removed? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/db2f0f4e-6f63-4246-a1cd-7a509f378...@me.com