Constantly Usable Testing team forming

2010-08-14 Thread Joey Hess
At DebConf there was a standing-room-only BoF to see if it made sense to form a team to work on the Constantly Usable Testing (CUT) idea. My feeling of the BoF session is that the project is generally open to the idea of doing something to make testing more generally usable. And has a lot of ideas

Re: constantly usable testing

2010-07-23 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 23/07/10 at 09:16 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote: > On Jo, 22 iul 10, 22:51:32, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 03:10:16PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > > I've noticed that linking to this page seems to kill threads, which is > > > not my intent, but: http://kitenet.net/~joey/co

Re: constantly usable testing

2010-07-22 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Jo, 22 iul 10, 22:51:32, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 03:10:16PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > I've noticed that linking to this page seems to kill threads, which is > > not my intent, but: http://kitenet.net/~joey/code/debian/cut/ > > > > The idea still seems reasonable to

Re: constantly usable testing

2010-07-22 Thread Joerg Jaspert
>> Have you ever actually tried to call people to arms and *form* the CUT >> team? > No. But it's been 3 years, so please don't wait for me to do it. ;) JFTR, with the great new machine ftpmaster got, we actually have the resources to run such a thing (archive wise, manpower is different). That i

Re: constantly usable testing

2010-07-22 Thread Joey Hess
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > Have you ever actually tried to call people to arms and *form* the CUT > team? No. But it's been 3 years, so please don't wait for me to do it. ;) -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

constantly usable testing

2010-07-22 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 03:10:16PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > I've noticed that linking to this page seems to kill threads, which is > not my intent, but: http://kitenet.net/~joey/code/debian/cut/ > > The idea still seems reasonable to me, and the work required, beyond > what is already done, not t