Tshepang Lekhonkhobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I ended up downgrading to xfree86 from testing, and then upgraded back up
>> to xorg from unstable (and all that went smoothly).
>
> I was also using ubuntu's xorg on Sid, but unlike you I am still
> unable to install xserver-xorg and xserver-comm
On 7/15/05, Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FWIW, I previously had xorg from Ubuntu installed, and upgrading from
> that to Debian's xorg _didn't_ go smoothly: the file "/etc/X11/Xsession"
> was created by two packages, x11-common [debian], and xorg-common
> [ubuntu], and in upgrading tri
On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 02:53:42PM +0300, Jaakko Niemi wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, David Nusinow wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 02:41:18PM +0300, Jaakko Niemi wrote:
> > > On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Sean Perry wrote:
> > > > I just updated to X.org. With apt. Automatically. Woohoo!! I mean full
>
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 02:41:18PM +0300, Jaakko Niemi wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Sean Perry wrote:
> > > I just updated to X.org. With apt. Automatically. Woohoo!! I mean full
> > > on xserver-xorg too. I did not touch ANYTHING.
> >
> > My only g
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 08:21:36PM +0200, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> Well, dosn't work either. It was just a idea that all the packages don't
> get deinstalled and maybe can be used. Also pdl which is needed for
> gimp-perl has wrong dependencies.
I've already uploaded a fixed pdl package, but it didn'
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 12:08:00PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 10:17:24AM +0200, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
> > my congratulation to the team too. However I was not as fortunate as the
> > Sean.
> >
>
> Me too, at least on this machine I had to explicitly install
>
David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 10:59:21AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
[...]
>> Why do people think that xorg broke library dependencies for our
>> entertainment, and that patching over the dependencies is an ok solution?
>> The package name changed because it i
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 02:04:14PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 10:59:21AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 07:21:28PM +0200, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> > > I will try to make a dummy-package which provides xlibmesa-glu and
> > > depends on libglu1-xorg.
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 08:21:36PM +0200, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> Am Fr den 15. Jul 2005 um 20:04 schrieb David Nusinow:
> > I'm mainly depressed that people aren't reading Planet Debian, or are just
>
> Aham, sorry for my ignorance, but what is Planet Debian?
http://planet.debian.org. Specifically
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello foks,
Am Fr den 15. Jul 2005 um 19:32 schrieb David Nusinow:
> > I will try to make a dummy-package which provides xlibmesa-glu and
> > depends on libglu1-xorg. ;-)
>
> Please don't do this. We're trying to transition the libglu1-xorg packages
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 08:07:55PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Steve Langasek:
>
> > Why do people think that xorg broke library dependencies for our
> > entertainment, and that patching over the dependencies is an ok
> > solution?
>
> Because there was no recent announcement on debian-devel
* David Nusinow:
> I'm mainly depressed that people aren't reading Planet Debian, or are just
> ignoring it. Is there a better place to post this sort of thing so that
> users don't keep repeating the same non-bug? The BTS obviously isn't
> working for us here either, nor is posting to debian-x.
* Steve Langasek:
> Why do people think that xorg broke library dependencies for our
> entertainment, and that patching over the dependencies is an ok
> solution?
Because there was no recent announcement on debian-devel-announce
which provided some guidance for this transition?
The packaging its
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 10:59:21AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 07:21:28PM +0200, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> > I will try to make a dummy-package which provides xlibmesa-glu and
> > depends on libglu1-xorg. ;-)
>
> Why do people think that xorg broke library dependencies for o
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 07:21:28PM +0200, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> Also congratulation from me too. I thought of many think that whould be
> broken but only few packages I liked very much did not work anymore as
> they need xlibmesa-glu:
> xine
> openuniverse
> planetpenguin-racer
> audacity
> flightg
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 07:21:28PM +0200, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> Also congratulation from me too. I thought of many think that whould be
> broken but only few packages I liked very much did not work anymore as
> they need xlibmesa-glu:
> xine
> openuniverse
> planetpenguin-racer
> audacity
> flightg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> I will try to make a dummy-package which provides xlibmesa-glu and
> depends on libglu1-xorg. ;-)
Hmpf, dosn't work as libglu1-xorg conflicts xlibmesa-glu :-(
Regards
Klaus
- --
Klaus Ethgenhttp://www.ethgen.de/
pub
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Also congratulation from me too. I thought of many think that whould be
broken but only few packages I liked very much did not work anymore as
they need xlibmesa-glu:
xine
openuniverse
planetpenguin-racer
audacity
flightgear
ssystem
stellarium
xscreens
On Thursday 14 July 2005 04:29 pm, Greg Folkert wrote:
> But, I don't see the rendering problems others see. Of course I have an
When I first started up xorg after the upgrade, it took a full 100% of the
CPU. I restarted X, same deal...So I rebooted and started X, and the problem
disappeared. Si
FWIW, I previously had xorg from Ubuntu installed, and upgrading from
that to Debian's xorg _didn't_ go smoothly: the file "/etc/X11/Xsession"
was created by two packages, x11-common [debian], and xorg-common
[ubuntu], and in upgrading tried to install x11-common before removing
xorg-common.
I en
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 11:43:50AM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> On 7/14/05, Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The server hasn't been modularised yet, it's just that I split up all
> > the packaging. I've been working closely with Josh Triplett on the
> > libraries, and keeping David fu
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 00:42 -0700, Sean Perry wrote:
> I just updated to X.org. With apt. Automatically. Woohoo!! I mean full
> on xserver-xorg too. I did not touch ANYTHING.
>
> X team you rock. This is why I started using Debian 7 years ago. This is
> what keeps me here.
>
> One and only one
"Francesco P. Lovergine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 10:17:24AM +0200, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
>> my congratulation to the team too. However I was not as fortunate as the
>> Sean.
>>
>
> Me too, at least on this machine I had to explicitly install
> xserver-xorg to comple
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 12:42:54AM -0700, Sean Perry wrote:
> I just updated to X.org. With apt. Automatically. Woohoo!! I mean full
> on xserver-xorg too. I did not touch ANYTHING.
>
> X team you rock. This is why I started using Debian 7 years ago. This is
> what keeps me here.
>
> One and on
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 02:41:18PM +0300, Jaakko Niemi wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Sean Perry wrote:
> > I just updated to X.org. With apt. Automatically. Woohoo!! I mean full
> > on xserver-xorg too. I did not touch ANYTHING.
>
> My only gripe is that the upload did not have pciids for
> rad
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 12:08:00PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 10:17:24AM +0200, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
> > my congratulation to the team too. However I was not as fortunate as the
> > Sean.
> >
>
> Me too, at least on this machine I had to explicitly install
>
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 11:02:09AM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> I see that yesterday a modularized xserver (xorg) entered ubuntu
> breezy (the current development branch) archives.
It's exciting stuff, but my primary goal is to get the current X.Org
release in to etch.
> I've some questions: Is
On 7/14/05, Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The server hasn't been modularised yet, it's just that I split up all
> the packaging. I've been working closely with Josh Triplett on the
> libraries, and keeping David fully in the loop with everything I'm doing
> in Breezy, and I'm pretty
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 11:02:09AM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> I see that yesterday a modularized xserver (xorg) entered ubuntu
> breezy (the current development branch) archives.
>
> I've some questions: Is XSF coordinating its work with them or what ?
> Is modularized xorg a goal for us ? I t
I see that yesterday a modularized xserver (xorg) entered ubuntu
breezy (the current development branch) archives.
I've some questions: Is XSF coordinating its work with them or what ?
Is modularized xorg a goal for us ? I think that it's easy to do since
some if not all xorg ubuntu maintainers ar
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Sean Perry wrote:
> I just updated to X.org. With apt. Automatically. Woohoo!! I mean full
> on xserver-xorg too. I did not touch ANYTHING.
My only gripe is that the upload did not have pciids for
radeon X700 etc.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2005/06/msg00179.html
N
* Francesco P. Lovergine:
> Me too, at least on this machine I had to explicitly install
> xserver-xorg to complete the move. BTW, I see the rendering of some ttf
> fonts looks not so good. For instance I used happily this resource:
>
> XTerm*Font: -monotype-andale mono-medium-r-normal--15-0-0-0-c
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 10:17:24AM +0200, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
> my congratulation to the team too. However I was not as fortunate as the
> Sean.
>
Me too, at least on this machine I had to explicitly install
xserver-xorg to complete the move. BTW, I see the rendering of some ttf
fonts looks no
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 10:17:24AM +0200, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
> What about the xlibmesa-glu packages? Can we expect them to enter the
> archive again? Else I have to remove some of my shiny GL applications
> (crystalspace, freewrl, libdevil,...)
Build-dep on "libglu1-xorg-dev | libglu-dev", and
Hello,
my congratulation to the team too. However I was not as fortunate as the
Sean.
What about the xlibmesa-glu packages? Can we expect them to enter the
archive again? Else I have to remove some of my shiny GL applications
(crystalspace, freewrl, libdevil,...)
Greetings Ben
--
Please do no
I just updated to X.org. With apt. Automatically. Woohoo!! I mean full
on xserver-xorg too. I did not touch ANYTHING.
X team you rock. This is why I started using Debian 7 years ago. This is
what keeps me here.
One and only one snag. purging the xfree86-common package failed because
it was t
36 matches
Mail list logo
