Re: completeness of the upg tests

2010-05-31 Thread C. Gatzemeier
Am Mon, 31 May 2010 12:17:54 +0200 schrieb Harald Braumann: > > I believe this completes the checks (see below) > > I don't, and that is what I meant by wishful thinking. Nowhere is it > guaranteed that it works this way. Could you please be a little more specific and try to provide a counter

Re: completeness of the upg tests

2010-05-31 Thread Harald Braumann
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 12:34:38PM +0200, C. Gatzemeier wrote: > > Thank you Harald for scrutinizing. > > Am Fri, 28 May 2010 14:50:27 +0200 > schrieb Harald Braumann: > > If that externel system means to have UPGs, but does not support > propper ID allignment (like debian, at least in the last

completeness of the upg tests (was: test if primary group, with only implicit membership of the user?)

2010-05-29 Thread C. Gatzemeier
Thank you Harald for scrutinizing. Am Fri, 28 May 2010 14:50:27 +0200 schrieb Harald Braumann: > On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:30:25AM +0200, C. Gatzemeier wrote: > > I'm not sure yet, if I do properly understand the point when/why > > relaxing conditionally is a bad idea. To me, setting *fixed* um