Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
] It could be better described, yes. My understanding of /usr/share as
] "architecture-independent" (and read-only, as the description
] continues) is that /usr/share/can potentially be mounted read-only
] for multiple machines of different architectures.
Ok,
On 09-May-2005, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ] [Sebastian Kuzminsky]
> ] > the shell libraries are moved to /usr/lib/cogito.
> ] Correct, except that it should be /usr/share/cogito/.
>
> The FHS describes /usr/share as "architecture-independent data", a
Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
] [Sebastian Kuzminsky]
] > Before 0.10, the upstream installed both the binaries (actually shell
] > scripts) and the shell libraries in /usr/bin. Starting with 0.10,
] > the shell libraries are moved to /usr/lib/cogito.
]
] Correct, except that it shou
su, 2005-05-08 kello 22:15 -0600, Sebastian Kuzminsky kirjoitti:
> The only lintian/linda complaints are from missing manpages. Some
> upstream folks are working on translating the existing docs from .txt
> to manpages (actually asciidoc), so it'll hopefully get cleaner soon
> without me lifting a
[Sebastian Kuzminsky]
> Before 0.10, the upstream installed both the binaries (actually shell
> scripts) and the shell libraries in /usr/bin. Starting with 0.10,
> the shell libraries are moved to /usr/lib/cogito.
Correct, except that it should be /usr/share/cogito/.
Thanks for packaging this.
Get it here:
http://highlab.com/~seb/debian
Before 0.10, the upstream installed both the binaries (actually shell
scripts) and the shell libraries in /usr/bin. Starting with 0.10, the
shell libraries are moved to /usr/lib/cogito. This seems to me like a
fine thing to do, any reason Debian
6 matches
Mail list logo
