Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: libffi-checklib-perl
Version : 0.14
Upstream Author : Graham Ollis
* URL : http://perl.wdlabs.com/FFI-CheckLib
* License : Artistic or GPL
Package: wnpp
Owner: gregor herrmann
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libdevel-checklib-perl
Version : 0.92
Upstream Author : Yasuhiro Matsumoto
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Devel
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 04:24:20PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
[]
> > - `objdump' can handle one file at time (and not buggy).
>
> I don't understand that comment.
> ,[ Manual page objdump(1) ]
> | SYNOPSIS
> |objdump [-a|--archive-headers] <> objfile...
> | DESCRIPTION
>
* From: Manoj Srivastava
* Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 16:24:20 -0500
> On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 20:53:10 + (UTC), Oleg Verych
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>> Notes about original:
>> - `basename' doesn't work,
>
> Why? It seems to work perfectly fine here.
> __> basename
> /usr/local/src/arch
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 20:53:10 + (UTC), Oleg Verych
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Notes about original:
> - `basename' doesn't work,
Why? It seems to work perfectly fine here.
__> basename
/usr/local/src/arch/packages--debian/kernel-package/kernel-package/debian/common/checklibs
checkli
* From: Manoj Srivastava
* Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 12:04:01 -0500
* Organization: The Debian Project
[]
> (I tend not to optimize before determining whether it is needed).
Even trailing whitespace your editor tend not to remove, before X
time ;)
[]
> If someone wants to port my simple sh
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 11:13:32 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2007 17:59:15 +0300, Guillem Jover said:
> > On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 02:19:33 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > > Has this been fixed in the latest incantation?
> > Please "fix" this by adding an additional mode/view, no
On Wed, 30 May 2007 22:58:38 +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On Wed, 30 May 2007 18:28:43 +0200, Raphael Hertzog
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>> What Guillem sai
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 30 May 2007 18:28:43 +0200, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> What Guillem said is that checklib also indicated binaries which are
>> linked against a library without using any of its symbols. Thus the
&g
had shared
>> objects whose compile flags were not identical.
> What Guillem said is that checklib also indicated binaries which are
> linked against a library without using any of its symbols. Thus the
> binary shouldn't have been linked against it in the first place. That
> link
End result: Uneedded: libfoo-dev, libbar-dev, and libbaz-dev
>
> Since that is patently wrong, the version of checklibs I looked
> at produced meaningless output -- for any package that had shared
> objects whose compile flags were not identical.
What Guillem said is that ch
On Wed, 30 May 2007 17:59:15 +0300, Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 02:19:33 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Thu, 24 May 2007 20:26:00 +0200, A Mennucc said:
>> > hi what about http://rerun.lefant.net/checklib/ ?
>>
>&g
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 02:19:33 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Thu, 24 May 2007 20:26:00 +0200, A Mennucc said:
> > hi what about http://rerun.lefant.net/checklib/ ?
>
> > madcoder mentioned in
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/01/msg00822.htmlof the
>
Hi,
On Thu, 24 May 2007 20:26:00 +0200, A Mennucc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> hi what about http://rerun.lefant.net/checklib/ ?
> madcoder mentioned in
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/01/msg00822.htmlof the
> intention of getting the checklib service up a
e collab-qa alioth project for that, if you want.
there is a 'checklib' project in alioth
a.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 24/05/07 at 21:22 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 08:26:00PM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
> > hi
> >
> > what about http://rerun.lefant.net/checklib/ ?
> >
> > madcoder mentioned in
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/0
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 09:22:12PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>
> We're still waitinf for the lufthansa machines to set it up :/
>
That remembers me that having some bits about that would be nice.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 08:26:00PM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
> hi
>
> what about http://rerun.lefant.net/checklib/ ?
>
> madcoder mentioned in
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/01/msg00822.html
> of the intention of getting the checklib service up again: any pro
hi
what about http://rerun.lefant.net/checklib/ ?
madcoder mentioned in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/01/msg00822.html
of the intention of getting the checklib service up again: any progress?
also, where do I get the source code from (since the link
http://greek0.net/div
* Christian Aichinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-29 11:34]:
> If you have any questions about setting up the beast, don't hasitate
> to mail me, though. Perhaps I'll even find some time to revive
> rerun.lefant.net/checklib
And we will get one of the LH machines to ru
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 12:12:16PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 12:00:58PM +0600, Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is checklib stopped? Pages say sth like 'Last update: Sun, 08 Oct 2006
> > 17:26:18'.
> >
> > Has
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 12:00:58PM +0600, Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is checklib stopped? Pages say sth like 'Last update: Sun, 08 Oct 2006
> 17:26:18'.
>
> Has checklib been relocated to another place or just abandoned?
actually, thanks to Ganneff and Luft
Hi,
Is checklib stopped? Pages say sth like 'Last update: Sun, 08 Oct 2006
17:26:18'.
Has checklib been relocated to another place or just abandoned?
--
JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:47:48 +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> I also couldn't find in the FAQ [3] any reference about how to
> download checklib.
> [3] http://rerun.lefant.net/checklib/faq.html
> How can download and run checklib?
On http://rerun.lefant.net/checklib/ t
Hello,
There is a link to Checklib [0] in the Packages Overview page
of every maintainer. See for example vorlon's page at [1] where
you could see that link in the line starting with "Reports:".
[0] http://rerun.lefant.net/checklib/
[1] http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=vor
25 matches
Mail list logo
