Re: building own package

On Wednesday 03 August 2005 08:12 PM, Tomas Davidek wrote: Yes, this is exactly the problem - the *.orig.tar.gz should be unpacked, but apparently it is not. When I have in my makefile: . install: cp -a usr $(DESTDIR)/usr . it fails with the error message: -- # Add

Re: building own package

On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 04:42:33PM +0200, Tomas Davidek wrote: > Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 11:21:35AM +0200, Tomas Davidek wrote: >>> * I store all the scripts in a tarball, >> If you are using the .orig.tar.gz directly, you have misunderstood >> the structure of a Debi

Re: building own package

Hello again, thanks to all who replied to my previous mail. Using your advice I solved/correct all the problems/bugs, but still there is one thing I don't understand: Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 11:21:35AM +0200, Tomas Davidek wrote: * I store all the scripts in a

Re: building own package

On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 11:21:35AM +0200, Tomas Davidek wrote: > * since the pakcage contains only few shell scripts, it should be > architecture-independent. Therefore, I specified "Architecture: any" in > the "control" file and also moved all the action in the "rules" file > into the binary-in

Re: building own package

(You may - or may not - have more luck on [EMAIL PROTECTED] for that kind of questions.) On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 11:21:35AM +0200, Tomas Davidek wrote: > * I store all the scripts in a tarball, Do you mean the .orig.tar.gz or do you mean a tarball in the unpacked Debian sources (the result of d

building own package

Hello, I am trying to build my own package (containing only few shell scripts) to make easier the system maintainance specific to our department. I followed the instruction in the Debian New Maintainer's Guide, but I probably misunderstood something, since I have the following problems: * I