Hi,
After the recent spate of rebuilds for the new glibc, I had a couple packages
fail in their respective post-build test suite. For one package, the buildd
failure went away after a rebuild. The second package, libminc, however
failed on the buildd as recently as yesterday.
https
Neil Williams wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 21:52 +0100, Jiří Paleček wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I was looking at the swfdec0.6 package and wondered why it is unavailable
>> on almost all architectures.
>
> It only exists in experimental - packages in experimental *might* be
> autobuilt but the onl
On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 21:52 +0100, Jiří Paleček wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was looking at the swfdec0.6 package and wondered why it is unavailable
> on almost all architecture.
It only exists in experimental - packages in experimental *might* be
autobuilt but the only way to be sure is to get the pa
Hello,
I was looking at the swfdec0.6 package and wondered why it is unavailable
on almost all architecture. So I looked at the build logs and they
(almost) fail in a quite strange way. It seems apt installed a broken set
of packages (even though a package set satisfying the build-dependenc
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 04:13:29PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 05:04:15PM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 03, 2003, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > > > # out of date on hppa: libzorpll, libzorpll-dev (from 2.0.5.2-1)
> > >
> > > Go to buildd.debian.org, read the log an
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 05:03:09PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 10:35:51AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 12:31:42PM +0200, Attila SZALAY wrote:
> >
> > > What can I do with this (from packages.qa.debian.org):
> > >
> > > # 42 days old
Hi All!
On 2003 Jun 03, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>
> In any case, debian-devel in general is not likely to know, but the buildd
> admin will.
I only ask what can I do.
- Send an email to hppa buildd maintainer
- Send an email to debian-hppa mail list
- Report a bug
- Wait
- Other.
That's all.
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 05:03:09PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 10:35:51AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 12:31:42PM +0200, Attila SZALAY wrote:
> >
> > > What can I do with this (from packages.qa.debian.org):
> > >
> > > # 42 days ol
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
> >Attila, if I were you I'd just try to upload a new release.
>
> I wouldn't, that just means you get another 10-day delay before the
> package gets into testing.
Yup, but you missed the subliminal message in my "try lintian" hint :-)
Regards,
-
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 10:43:25AM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Attila SZALAY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > # out of date on hppa: libzorpll, libzorpll-dev (from 2.0.5.2-1)
> Hm, http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg=libzorpll seems to
> indicate that the hppa autobuilder never attempted
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 05:04:15PM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2003, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > > # out of date on hppa: libzorpll, libzorpll-dev (from 2.0.5.2-1)
> >
> > Go to buildd.debian.org, read the log and find out what happened.
>
>But the buildd didn't even try to buil
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 10:35:51AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 12:31:42PM +0200, Attila SZALAY wrote:
>
> > What can I do with this (from packages.qa.debian.org):
> >
> > # 42 days old (needed 10 days)
> > # out of date on hppa: libzorpll, libzorpll-dev (from 2.0.
Attila SZALAY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> # out of date on hppa: libzorpll, libzorpll-dev (from 2.0.5.2-1)
Hm, http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg=libzorpll seems to
indicate that the hppa autobuilder never attempted 2.0.26.4-1 for some
reason. Try building it yourself in paer's sid c
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > # out of date on hppa: libzorpll, libzorpll-dev (from 2.0.5.2-1)
>
> Go to buildd.debian.org, read the log and find out what happened.
But the buildd didn't even try to build 2.0.26.4-1.
Attila, if I were you I'd just try to upload a new rele
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 12:31:42PM +0200, Attila SZALAY wrote:
> What can I do with this (from packages.qa.debian.org):
>
> # 42 days old (needed 10 days)
> # out of date on hppa: libzorpll, libzorpll-dev (from 2.0.5.2-1)
>
> This is with package libzorpll.
Go to buildd.debian.org, read the log
Hi All!
What can I do with this (from packages.qa.debian.org):
# 42 days old (needed 10 days)
# out of date on hppa: libzorpll, libzorpll-dev (from 2.0.5.2-1)
This is with package libzorpll.
--
PGP ID 0x8D143771, /C5 95 43 F8 6F 19 E8 29 53 5E 96 61 05 63 42 D0
GPG ID ABA0E8B2, 45CF B559 82
16 matches
Mail list logo
