On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 05:08:11PM +, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> * Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-21 10:34]:
> > > get this in. I can confirm that the patch in our firefox works -
> > > at least firefox starts and loads the Debian homepage. I'll play
> > > some
* Martin Michlmayr ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> * Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-21 10:34]:
> > > get this in. I can confirm that the patch in our firefox works -
> > > at least firefox starts and loads the Debian homepage. I'll play
> > > some more with it later.
> >
> > If I recall
* Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-21 10:34]:
> > get this in. I can confirm that the patch in our firefox works -
> > at least firefox starts and loads the Debian homepage. I'll play
> > some more with it later.
>
> If I recall correctly, only the submitter of the bug and people
> prop
* Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-21 13:19]:
> Oh? Are they sent upstream? Are they for 2.0.x?
I've got hold of the patches now. I'll review what I'v been sent
exactly and then move this discussion over to
debian-openoffice@lists.debian.org
> I guess they work only with non-Java, tho
* Martin Michlmayr ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> * Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-21 13:08]:
> > FWIW, Thiemo's patch has been in debian's firefox for a while
> > (well, at least that of bugzilla #258429), and is also aaplied to
> > xulrunner.
>
> I can confirm that firefox in Debian work
* Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-21 13:19]:
> > Apparently they also have patches for OOo.
>
> Oh? Are they sent upstream? Are they for 2.0.x?
No, they said they were too busy to clean them up for submission right
now. I'll see if I can get a copy of the current patches.
> I guess
* Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-21 13:08]:
> FWIW, Thiemo's patch has been in debian's firefox for a while
> (well, at least that of bugzilla #258429), and is also aaplied to
> xulrunner.
I can confirm that firefox in Debian works. However, what can we do
to finally get this patch into
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 11:56:36AM +, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> * Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-21 09:46]:
> > So I'm wondering if building xulrunner with debugging symbols is
> > possible considering the buildd infrastructure, or at all useful on
> > arches like
* Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-21 09:46]:
> So I'm wondering if building xulrunner with debugging symbols is
> possible considering the buildd infrastructure, or at all useful on
> arches like m68k, mips, sparc, where the userbase might be quite low
FWIW, mozilla is pretty broken on mi
Am Dienstag 21 März 2006 12:56 schrieb Martin Michlmayr:
> * Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-21 09:46]:
> > So I'm wondering if building xulrunner with debugging symbols is
> > possible considering the buildd infrastructure, or at all useful on
> > arches like m68k, mips, sparc, where the
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-21 12:32]:
> > Oh? Are they sent upstream? Are they for 2.0.x?
>
> No, they said they were too busy to clean them up for submission right
> now. I'll see if I can get a copy of the current patches.
(Oh, and yes, they are for 2.0).
--
Martin Michlm
Hi fellow developpers,
I'm considering building xulrunner with debugging symbols enabled (and
putting them in a separate -dbg package), but if I recall correctly,
it has been disabled from firefox and mozilla builds because of the time
and disk space required (something like 2GB) that could be a b
12 matches
Mail list logo
