Re: buildd administration -- TeX related FTBFS

2005-12-23 Thread Frank Küster
Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > >> Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... >> > I think one to ease tension is to make tetex packages to coexist in >> > archive just like many gcc. [...] > I should have been clear. I wish them to coexist only in "archive" but > they can conflic

Re: buildd administration -- TeX related FTBFS

2005-12-22 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 01:48:12PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... > > I think one to ease tension is to make tetex packages to coexist in > > archive just like many gcc. > > That would be nice - but it would cause even more work, I fear. And it > woul

Re: buildd administration -- TeX related FTBFS

2005-12-20 Thread Frank Küster
Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I hope situation will be better soon but I am still struggling why > debiandoc-sgml-doc fails to build nicely. (Yes, I know I can get by by > not checking exit code during build process. But that is not a good fix > I want to do.) Any help is appreciated.

Re: buildd administration -- TeX related FTBFS

2005-12-20 Thread Frank Küster
Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I realize TeX is tough program to maintain. Thanks to Frank. > > One quick and easy way to avoid TeX related build issues are to avoid > using TeX related tools during build time. So the results will be > Debian only ships documentations in plain te

Re: buildd administration -- TeX related FTBFS

2005-12-18 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, I realize TeX is tough program to maintain. Thanks to Frank. One quick and easy way to avoid TeX related build issues are to avoid using TeX related tools during build time. So the results will be Debian only ships documentations in plain text and HTML. (No PS and no PDF). But is it what w