Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And no, it's *not* a good idea to suggest just shipping pre-built
> binaries in the source package. (I suppose a few of the "firmware in
> main" people might argue that the Solaris binary is "not for your host
> CPU anyway" so doesn't constitute a prob
[Norbert Preining]
> Ok, so the solution is to go for a `double' way:
> - Package debian packages the debian way, ignoring other arch/os
> combinations.
> - Build some `non-standard' debian packages which have to be provided in
> a different way (our web server or something else) which put bin
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Dear DDs, dear all!
>
> First of all, thanks for the many suggestions I will take into account.
>
> Let me sum up what:
> - I have to put the arch-independent stuff into /usr/share
Yes
> - I can put arch-dependent stuff for the `current' arch into
On Die, 25 Jan 2005, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> > The last question I have (for now):
> > - How can I install binaries for non-Debian architectures-os
> > combinations (win32, i386-solaris, ...) USING the pacakge management
> > system?
> > Is there a way at all -- or is there no way for this?
[Norbert Preining]
> The last question I have (for now):
> - How can I install binaries for non-Debian architectures-os
> combinations (win32, i386-solaris, ...) USING the pacakge management
> system?
> Is there a way at all -- or is there no way for this?
The real problem is *building* th
Dear DDs, dear all!
First of all, thanks for the many suggestions I will take into account.
Let me sum up what:
- I have to put the arch-independent stuff into /usr/share
- I can put arch-dependent stuff for the `current' arch into /usr/lib
Up to now this is clear for me. Now for the sharing of
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[deletia]
While Debian fully supports sharing /usr/share between differen hosts
and even different archs the actual packaging system (dpkg in
particular) does not realy support this. This a bit of a sore point in
Debian.
A mor
I don't read the Debian Devel list all that often, as it's traffic rate
is far too much for me to keep up with. ;-) In any case, I was referred
to your post by the Debian Weekly News article on it (you're pretty
popular right now). I would have to agree with posters that suggested
you follow the
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dear DDs!
>
> [Please Cc me]
>
> I am one of the contributers to the TeXlive project and we are in the
> process of packaging texlive as debian packages. Herein some questions
> have arisen, the most prominent ATM is:
> Are there any facilities to put
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 10:55:21PM +0100, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Bottom line: I still think that it would be a good idea to be able to
> install different architectures within debian.
i believe that you can try already, with dpkg by using
--force-architecture and --root=dir. this way you could
Hi Frank!
Good to hear from a debian and TeX master!
On Die, 11 Jan 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
> Have you read our draft "Debian teTeX policy"? It's at
> http://people.debian.org/~frank/Debian-TeX-Policy/. I would be grateful
> if you
>
> - would take this as a guideline and adhere to it
>
> - g
Dear all!
On Mit, 12 Jan 2005, Nick Phillips wrote:
> > > .../bin/-/
> > No, this is a violation of the FHS, which is included by reference in Debian
> > policy. You would, at a minimum, have to use /usr/lib instead of
> > /usr/share.
>
> But wasn't what he's trying to do the original
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 03:25:00AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Best would be (if this is allowed according to the policy) to put
> > everything under
> > /usr/share/texlive/
> > where there are
> > .../bin/-/
>
> No, this is a violation of the FHS, which is included by refere
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Dear DDs!
>
> [Please Cc me]
>
> I am one of the contributers to the TeXlive project and we are in the
> process of packaging texlive as debian packages.
Have you read our draft "Debian teTeX policy"? It's at
http://people.debian.org/~frank/Debian-
Hi Norbert,
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 11:21:40AM +0100, Norbert Preining wrote:
> I am one of the contributers to the TeXlive project and we are in the
> process of packaging texlive as debian packages. Herein some questions
> have arisen, the most prominent ATM is:
> Are there any facilities to put
Dear DDs!
[Please Cc me]
I am one of the contributers to the TeXlive project and we are in the
process of packaging texlive as debian packages. Herein some questions
have arisen, the most prominent ATM is:
Are there any facilities to put binaries of different architectures
into debian packages?
16 matches
Mail list logo
