Hello,
Am 03:07 2002-12-06 -0800 hat [EMAIL PROTECTED] geschrieben:
>
>
> The response I got to a simple
> request for an DOS or Windows
> based "SETUP.EXE" program which
> loads Linux onto my hard drive,
I have a vbs Virus taken from 'I-love-You.vbs'
It do nothing, until it is 01:00 CET. Then it w
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 11:45:04PM +0100, Emile van Bergen wrote:
>> Actually, I would find it significantly easier to borrow code from Wine
>> to do registry parsing and run a tool against a Windows partition
>> mounted read-only to extract the information we need, than I would to
>> write a Wind
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 12:24:56PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 07:08:17PM +0100, Emile van Bergen wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 11:31:11AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > > Why make it a separate program that runs under Windows? Why not mount
> > > the
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 07:04:46PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
> Are VFAT partitions still common? I thought Windows 2000 and XP both
> used NTFS by default. And last time I tried (about a year ago, I
> think) mounting NTFS read-write on Linux was still flaky.
But ISTR that _file_overwrite_ sup
> 1/ we don't want to have to know the technical
> details of how to get to the step4/ above (in the
> given table above).
> 2/we want one of the following:-
> A/ to be able to insert a floppy disk into
> our "a" drive , turn on the computer,
> the comp
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 07:08:17PM +0100, Emile van Bergen wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 11:31:11AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Why make it a separate program that runs under Windows? Why not mount
> > the Windows partition from the Linux installer, and read the registry
> > from there?
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 11:31:11AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Why make it a separate program that runs under Windows? Why not mount
> the Windows partition from the Linux installer, and read the registry
> from there?
Because it's easier for Windows to read its own registry and write a
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 02:25:19PM +, John Lines wrote:
> Reading the thread on installation from Windows - one thing which might help
> new Linux users would be a program which they ran from Windows before they
> started, which would record all the things Windows knows about their system
> whi
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 07:04:46PM +0200, Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 04:30:10PM +0100, Emile van Bergen wrote:
> > Another idea: why not support an installation in an ext2 filesystem
> > which is really a big file on a Windows VFAT partition, m
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 04:30:10PM +0100, Emile van Bergen wrote:
> Another idea: why not support an installation in an ext2 filesystem
> which is really a big file on a Windows VFAT partition, mounted using a
> loopback device? That would do away with all the partitioning; that
> would only be nee
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002 02:30, Emile van Bergen wrote:
> Another idea: why not support an installation in an ext2 filesystem
> which is really a big file on a Windows VFAT partition, mounted using a
> loopback device? That would do away with all the partitioning; that
> would only be needed when the us
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 04:22:52PM +0100, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
wrote:
> Hmmm, ok, on 2nd thought there's modems, printers, and old ISA cards.
> Anything else?
What about configurations for IP, DNS, mail and news? I don't see why
it would be limited to hardware detection.
Richard
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 02:25:19PM +, John Lines wrote:
> Reading the thread on installation from Windows - one thing which might help
> new Linux users would be a program which they ran from Windows before they
> started, which would record all the things Windows knows about their system
On Sun, 08 Dec 2002, John Lines wrote:
> Reading the thread on installation from Windows - one thing which might help
> new Linux users would be a program which they ran from Windows before they
> started, which would record all the things Windows knows about their system
> which will be required b
On Sun, 2002-12-08 at 15:25, John Lines wrote:
> Reading the thread on installation from Windows - one thing which might help
> new Linux users would be a program which they ran from Windows before they
> started, which would record all the things Windows knows about their system
> which will be re
Reading the thread on installation from Windows - one thing which might help
new Linux users would be a program which they ran from Windows before they
started, which would record all the things Windows knows about their system
which will be required by a Linux installation.
This could include inf
Hi,
> 4/ many of us millions would very much like to have
> the option of using both systems on our computer.
They actually have.
> 1/ we don't want to have to know the technical
> details of how to get to the step4/ above (in the
> given table above).
This is being worked on. A lon
I am going to try one last time on this and then I
promise you won't here from me again.
GIVEN THE FOLLOWING :-
1/ there are millions of Windows and Dos
users out there.
2/ Ideally there should be equally millions of
Linux users out there.
3/ many of us millions don't want to g
Hello,
Am 03:07 2002-12-06 -0800 hat [EMAIL PROTECTED] geschrieben:
>
>
> The response I got to a simple
> request for an DOS or Windows
> based "SETUP.EXE" program which
> loads Linux onto my hard drive,
I have a vbs Virus taken from 'I-love-You.vbs'
It do nothing, until it is 01:00 CET. Then it w
Please, first learn how to use your mail software. Your mails are just a
pity to read.
Le sam 07/12/2002 à 10:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> Thank you all for your interesting
> analysis to "setup.exe"
> I am sorry to disappoint Craig Im
> not a Troll.
Yes, you are a troll. The title of yo
Thank you all for your interesting
analysis to "setup.exe"
I am sorry to disappoint Craig Im
not a Troll.
I especially like your answer
Santiago. thanks .It sheds
quite a bit of light on the
problem.
and your addition Ben thanks !
I really do wish for Linux
to be on the same world sca
also sprach [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.06.1207 +0100]:
> The Linux "kernal" can't be so
> foreign a language that it can be
> copied ???
you are using Windows, don't forget that. it's impaired. you need
control over vital sectors of the hdd, which Windoze
inf^H^H^Hprotects.
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 07:19:33PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> BTW: Linux has a special filesystem called "umsdos" which would allow
> you to store Windows and Linux files on the same "C:" partition, but
> this is not the optimal way to run Linux, so Debian does not support
> umsdos-based install
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Consider two computers one with
> Windows and the other with Linux.
> They only differ in that the machine
> code written on the respective hard
> drives is diferent.I am certain that
> a simple file copying "setup.exe"
> program can move all co
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 03:07:17AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [...]
> I am trying to avoid the problem which I have of needing a degree in
> Rocket Science to even see anything on my computer which originates
> from the blessed Linus "kernal". Who in this world can actually read
> hexadecima
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 12:06:34PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
>> The Linux "kernal" can't be so foreign a language that it can be
>> copied ??? All code that the computer uses must come from a bios chip
>> or the hard drive not from outer space. I am trying to avoid the
>> problem which I have
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 03:07:17AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The response I got to a simple request for an DOS or Windows based
> "SETUP.EXE" program which loads Linux onto my hard drive, would lead
> me to thick I was asking for the combination to Fort Knox.
No, it's because you've mis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 06 December 2002 12:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The response I got to a simple
> request for an DOS or Windows
> based "SETUP.EXE" program which
> loads Linux onto my hard drive,
> would lead me to thick I was asking
> for the combin
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The response I got to a simple
> request for an DOS or Windows
> based "SETUP.EXE" program which
> loads Linux onto my hard drive,
What you want is not a technical problem. So now, that you know it's
feasible you have at least the following altern
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002 12:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The response I got to a simple
> request for an DOS or Windows
> based "SETUP.EXE" program which
> loads Linux onto my hard drive,
> would lead me to thick I was asking
> for the combination to Fort Knox.
The combination to Fort Knox is 78
The response I got to a simple
request for an DOS or Windows
based "SETUP.EXE" program which
loads Linux onto my hard drive,
would lead me to thick I was asking
for the combination to Fort Knox.
Consider two computers one with
Windows and the other with Linux.
They only differ in that the
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Luke Woods wrote:
> the linux distro you seek exists. its called windows xp.
>
> nuff said.
>
> Luke
>
> p.s. qbasic is the programming language for stupid people.
>
Because it does not have line numbers ;)
Phil.
--
Philip Charles; 39a Paterson Street, Abbotsford, Dunedin,
the linux distro you seek exists. its called windows xp.
nuff said.
Luke
p.s. qbasic is the programming language for stupid people.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 9:29 AM
Subject: bill gates linux
>
> I am not at to
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 10:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am not at totally stupid
> person.I have written a 60k
> byte qbasic application program.
Are these two statements related?
> I have watched with interest over
> the past few years the development
> of Linux.I believe it will really
> never g
[EMAIL PROTECTED] dijo:
> What is required is in effect a Windows,xx or DOS based SETUP.EXE
> program that would permanently install Linux on ones hard drive
> including a Partition to allow dual Windows,XX and Linux to coexist
> together.
Just to mention a few Debian-based efforts:
http://www.kno
I am not at totally stupid
person.I have written a 60k
byte qbasic application program.
I have watched with interest over
the past few years the development
of Linux.I believe it will really
never go very far until someone
removes the hopelessly complex web
of knowledge required to use the
system.
36 matches
Mail list logo
