Re: bash readline

2013-06-23 Thread Jack Andrews
On 31 January 2013 21:24, Michael Stapelberg wrote: >> but on ubu^H^H^Hdebian, rlwrap uses the vanilla readline and it's >> really annoying that i can't get the same line editing features with >> rlwrap (and, i expect, readline). > I can confirm that. I suspect libreadline differs from bash’s read

Re: bash readline

2013-01-31 Thread Michael Stapelberg
quot; — nothing happens, but in vim, this would replace “bar”. > now, i haven't looked closely, but i think the good vi mode is a patch > on (bash?) readline in debian? I suggest you look closely before posting: http://patch-tracker.debian.org/package/bash/4.2+dfsg-0.1 I see some pa

bash readline

2013-01-30 Thread Jack Andrews
hi dd, i really like the readline in bash - it seems bash is "vi complete" in vi mode. now, i haven't looked closely, but i think the good vi mode is a patch on (bash?) readline in debian? in centos, i can't "df;" and delete up to next semicolon. but on ubu^H^H^Hd