Le mardi 14 avril 2009 à 22:45 +0200, Santiago Vila a écrit :
> In either case, the genie is now out of the bottle.
>
> The file /etc/debian_version for lenny will contain, from now on,
> a string of the form 5.0.n where n is an integer number.
>
> If this causes breakage, let us fix such breakag
Le mardi 14 avril 2009 à 22:52 +0200, Luk Claes a écrit :
> > There were warnings since December 2007 [1], though you're right that a
> > reminder would not have been bad.
> [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/12/msg00742.html
My bad then, I should have noticed that at the time it was r
Luk Claes wrote:
> Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> Hi,
>
> Hi Josselin
>
>> the point release of lenny contains a change to /etc/debian_version.
>> This was done without any kind of warning, despite the fact that some
>> packages rely on the contents of this file.
>
> There were warnings since Decemb
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Josselin
> the point release of lenny contains a change to /etc/debian_version.
> This was done without any kind of warning, despite the fact that some
> packages rely on the contents of this file.
There were warnings since December 2007 [1], though you're right
On Tue, 14 Apr 2009, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the point release of lenny contains a change to /etc/debian_version.
> This was done without any kind of warning, despite the fact that some
> packages rely on the contents of this file.
This change was also a surprise to me. I knew that the
Hi,
the point release of lenny contains a change to /etc/debian_version.
This was done without any kind of warning, despite the fact that some
packages rely on the contents of this file.
Thanks for wasting people’s time.
--
.''`. Debian 5.0 "Lenny" has been released!
: :' :
`. `' Last n
6 matches
Mail list logo
