[Please CC me on replies.]
Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 12:42 AM, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > Does the backup process also respect CACHEDIR.TAG
> > (http://www.brynosaurus.com/cachedir/spec.html) in addition to
> > .nobackup?
>
> Looks like no:
>
> https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 12:42 AM, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Does the backup process also respect CACHEDIR.TAG
> (http://www.brynosaurus.com/cachedir/spec.html) in addition to
> .nobackup?
Looks like no:
https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=CACHEDIR.TAG+package:bacula
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.d
On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 06:13:30PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> tl;dr - backup server is running out of space: `touch .nobackup`
> whenever possible.
Does the backup process also respect CACHEDIR.TAG
(http://www.brynosaurus.com/cachedir/spec.html) in addition to
.nobackup?
- Josh Triplett
Hi,
On Mon Oct 03, 2016 at 18:22:57 +0200, Enrico Zini wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 06:13:30PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
>
> > Debian's resources are not infinite. Please `touch .nobackup` in a
> > directory containining unimportant / trivial to regenerate content. The
> > backup sof
On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 06:13:30PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Debian's resources are not infinite. Please `touch .nobackup` in a
> directory containining unimportant / trivial to regenerate content. The
> backup software will exclude from back up the files and subdirectories
> of any dire
5 matches
Mail list logo