Christian Perrier dijo [Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 06:13:21PM +0200]:
> > Nowadays, the recommended way to update config.sub/guess is transparent,
> > Debian-specific (but friendly to any sort of upstream config.sub/guess
> > usage pattern), version-control friendly, and also non-.diff-bloating.
>
> Cou
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 10:04:45PM +0200, Christian Aichinger wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 07:09:35PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > Woah, it's not okay for sourceful uploads either. You *cannot* change
> > anything that goes into the source package at build time. This
> > includes the top e
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 07:09:35PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 01:01:52AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > Adding changes would be ok for an upload which includes source
> > (i.e., .dsc and .diff), but it's simply the *wrong* thing to do when
> > an upload does not includ
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 07:09:35PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> Woah, it's not okay for sourceful uploads either. You *cannot* change
> anything that goes into the source package at build time. This
> includes the top entry in changelog and the source section of the
> control file. Trying to do
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 01:01:52AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Ok, this is already the second time I have to report a bug like this,
> so I will warn everybody before I find more of them.
>
> There seems to be a bunch of packages who try to update the changelog
> in this way:
>
>dch
> Nowadays, the recommended way to update config.sub/guess is transparent,
> Debian-specific (but friendly to any sort of upstream config.sub/guess
> usage pattern), version-control friendly, and also non-.diff-bloating.
Could you develop on that topic (or point me to some good reference,
of cou
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 07:11:37AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > [ If you do not believe this, visit buildd.debian.org and see the
> > build logs for the lifelines package, for example ].
>
> I am in the process of fixing this, thanks for reporting.
>
> However, I am completely sure that
> [ If you do not believe this, visit buildd.debian.org and see the
> build logs for the lifelines package, for example ].
I am in the process of fixing this, thanks for reporting.
However, I am completely sure that this did not went into the package
by accident and I was certainly misguided by
Ok, this is already the second time I have to report a bug like this,
so I will warn everybody before I find more of them.
There seems to be a bunch of packages who try to update the changelog
in this way:
dch -a -p "GNU config automated update: config.sub\
($$OLDDATESUB t
9 matches
Mail list logo
