Re: autoconf2.13

Zack Weinberg writes: > Ben Pfaff wrote: >> (Maybe it's time to get rid of the autoconf2.13 package >> altogether, come to think of it.) > > It's still needed for just about everything put out by Mozilla, alas > (iceweasel et al, obviously, but also libnspr and

Re: autoconf2.13 (was Re: Outdated config.{sub,guess} package list)

On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 11:10:46PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote: > Ben Pfaff wrote: > > (Maybe it's time to get rid of the autoconf2.13 package > > altogether, come to think of it.) > > It's still needed for just about everything put out by Mozilla, alas > (ic

autoconf2.13 (was Re: Outdated config.{sub,guess} package list)

Ben Pfaff wrote: > (Maybe it's time to get rid of the autoconf2.13 package > altogether, come to think of it.) It's still needed for just about everything put out by Mozilla, alas (iceweasel et al, obviously, but also libnspr and libnss, which are not just used by moz.org applicat

Re: Please move autoconf and autoconf2.13 into testing

On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 08:45:06AM +0200 , Simon Richter wrote: > Hi, > > it seems those two packages are depending on each other and are thus > stuck. php4-dev depends on autoconf2.13 and is also stuck therefore. Could if php4 was stuck only because of autoconf I&#

Please move autoconf and autoconf2.13 into testing

Hi, it seems those two packages are depending on each other and are thus stuck. php4-dev depends on autoconf2.13 and is also stuck therefore. Could you move these two packages into testing manually? Thanks, Simon -- GPG public key available from http://phobos.fs.tum.de/pgp/Simon.Richter.asc

Why don't autoconf and autoconf2.13 go into testing?

Hi, why don't autoconf and autoconf2.13 go into testing? update-excuses says: autoconf 2.52-2 (currently 2.13-27) (optional) (low) autoconf uploaded 21 days ago, out of date by 11 days! autoconf/[all archs]: Unsatisfiable Depends: autoconf2.13 (>= 2.13-34)